Only when you figure out the "planning problem" can your plan be called a plan!
A plan based on business logic, I'm sorry to tell you, it's not a plan yet. In most cases, the goal decomposition here is done, but the dimensions of decomposition are from people, regions, or product lines, precise to the business. For example, how much passenger volume needs, how much transaction conversion rate to do, how much to do the unit price. The setting of these indicators must not be regarded as the completion of the plan. An effective plan, in Professor Chen Chunhua's Common Sense of Management, is clear: a standard plan should include the following: (1) Goals/Objectives. (2) The validity of the plan. (3) The direction of action. (4) Procedures and methods of control. What's the matter (activity)? When (time to start and end) Who (responsible for what) Where (scope of implementation) the core elements are: (1) specific objectives (2) validity period (3) responsible person (4) guarantee measures that are to be able to clearly answer: who is needed at what time through what activities or what tasks to ensure the achievement of what goals, this question in order to refer to convenience, we call the "planning problem." One or one group or one can basically be implemented in this dimension