Very interesting thought experiment @kevinwong Yolanda debating about the role of content and it's 'potential' value.
I would suggest that the majority of content (what some would say is of low value)
Photos of everyday objects, food, even cats etc is exactly what many people share. It is what is important to them.
I don't see this content as being of little value to future generations. In fact quite the opposite.
The most interesting finds in archeology are found in the simplest cave drawings and the leftover scraps from midden piles.
In this way we can reconstruct what was important to those societies and individuals.
Curating the curators is a good idea but don't forget to add your opinions too.
Where would we be without the ancient curators and their commentary on their era.
We often find recurring themes down the ages.
A fascinating blog Kevin. Thank you.
Thanks @molometer, that's a beautiful response. I think the reason why some would say it's on the lower spectrum of value is because its the majority of content and hence, not as rare or novel.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
well said!!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
@molometer obviously understands value. I really appreciate that given Yolanda's billions. What is wealth? How does it relate to value?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit