Hunter-gatherer? If you want.
Feudalism? No. What could possibly give you that idea? Feudal title has no relation whatsoever to property rights as defined by homesteading and voluntary exchange.
It's as if you have never encountered the ideas you wish to ridicule. All you have are strawman arguments, false dichotomies, appeals to emotion, and personal attacks. It seems the left is completely ignorant of ideas outside the political mainstream and their own circles. I could suggest some reading material if you like.
I reiterate: Because both of those things had far less people and far more natural resources.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
How is that relevant?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Economics.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Non sequitur
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Hey, if you don't know basic supply and demand then that's on you, bud.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Hey, if you don't know
Basic supply and demand
Then that's on you, bud.
- cyberdemon531
I'm a bot. I detect haiku.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
That is not what the term means. You're just spewing phrases that make no sense in this context.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
There are less resources (supply) and more people (demand) than the beginning of the human race, therefore your minecraft conspiracy philosophy isn't reasonable. You don't know history OR economics. It's hilarious and also pathetic.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Now there are more resources available for use, more innovative ways to use the resources available, and more people to split the production process and make exchanges for mutual benefit. If you think there was more wealth in the past with less people, I am afraid you may be the one with a flawed understanding of economics and history. Technological advancement has multiplied productive capability.
The market of price information signals where there is high demand, and offers a reward incentive for supplying that demand. If supply exceeds demand, or demands change over time, prices fall and profits (the reward for satisfying wants) vanish. That is what "supply and demand" means, in a nutshell. It does not mean less people = more supply, as you seem to assert.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit