Speed of Process

etherpunk (75) in thought • 7 years ago (edited)

An undedicated processor may only be at 1% progress of the work put out by a dedicated processor after a year, 0.1% in two years, 0.01% in three and so on.

thought

7 years ago by etherpunk (75)

$7.13

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!

Sort Order:

Trending

[-]

kartiksingh (65) · 7 years ago

It is similar to slow and steady wins the race.

$1.89

2 votes

[-]

heymattzappl (44) · 7 years ago

Step 1: Build a useful project, even if it is inefficient at first.

Step 2: Use Pareto Analysis, Actionable/Measurable Short Term Goals, Rapid OODA/Iteration Loop to delegate and automate project from Step 1.

Step 3: Keep trying to reduce system from step 1 to require minimal input from yourself - ideally, 1 hour or less per week.

Step 4: Maintain previous system(s) while looping Steps 1-3 (probably 1-2 successful iterations per year) until you have a bunch of ultra-effective projects, designed to pursue your aims, delegated and organized into less than 20 hours per week of total work time for you.

That's what I'm trying to do anyway... Like building many dedicated processors in parallel. Hopefully by age 40 I've got my selfish earnings, my philanthropy, and my "chaotic neutral" type projects all up and running :-)

$0.85

1 vote

[-]

kevinwong (76) · 7 years ago

Too many steps :P lol

$0.00

[-]

ansarmehmood (48) · 7 years ago

Faster cognitive processing may allow more information to be acquired.

$0.64

2 votes

[-]

kevinwong (76) · 7 years ago

Think fast, think slow :)

$0.00

[-]

roselifecoach (60) · 7 years ago

Isn't that how things always work!?
Hmm.. I have to think about it....

$0.42

1 vote

[-]

kevinwong (76) · 7 years ago

Just putting into numbers :)

$0.00

[-]

blazing (70) · 7 years ago (edited)

That's how you calculate ;)

$0.42

1 vote

[-]

kevinwong (76) · 7 years ago

I like to pretend to look like that in the library lol xD

$0.02

1 vote

[-]

calatorulmiop (57) · 7 years ago

I'll have to look that up to even know what it means :)

$0.39

1 vote

[-]

kevinwong (76) · 7 years ago

Nothing much, it just applies to people and systems :)

$0.00

[-]

markzuckerbergs (56) · 7 years ago

Slow process with consistency & persistency is better than Fast process that stops after some time.

$0.00

1 vote

[-]

anikearn (65) · 7 years ago

pls more details

$0.00

[-]

kingsberry (58) · 7 years ago

Probably it can be.

$0.00

[-]

cutiepie (58) · 7 years ago

that's so much progress in so little progress now where is that little progress think

$0.00

[-]

cityslicker (58) · 7 years ago

you need to change the processor and everything will be quick ;p

$0.00

[-]

dragonking (57) · 7 years ago

It was very slow old one and then need to replace very speedy processor.

$0.00

[-]

jakir007 (45) · 7 years ago

Thanks for sharing i will done upvote I always see your post. And follow you

$0.00

[-]

starboye (53) · 7 years ago

slow and steady some day will win the race i remembered that hare and the tortoise story

$0.00

[-]

salma-akanda (52) · 7 years ago

thanks for sharing. i will done upvote.i see your all post.

$0.00

[-]

sid9999 (52) · 7 years ago

In general, the increases in speeds are driven by reducing the size of components on microprocessor dies and reducing voltages. This reduces the amount of time and energy necessary to move between valid logic states on the microprocessor. There is little additional headroom to increase speed by die shrinking - this limit is driven by physical limitations of photolithography - which is why multi core processors are the growth path to increase performance..... Nice article @etherpunk!

$0.00