Review: What defines a decent film — the climax or the general packaging? If it boils all the way down to the climax, Michael is unquestionably among the ‘good’ bracket. however if we tend to take into account the general packaging, it’s tough to relinquish it a thumbs up. The story is hardly ‘onyo dhoroner’, the humour is clichéd and therefore the script reeks of a commentary debut. the total film looks virtually as light because the films in it (those created by Michael).
Then there’s the done-to-death slapstick humour that hits you spherical each bend. Sayani’s performance should be appreciated here, as most of it's expressed by her in character as Michael’s bungling girl Friday WHO makes a verbal fuckup each different second with a facial expression. She will it right, however like her, we tend to miss the joke. I mean, one bomb is okay, two, okay, however not associate degree endless barrage.
Upvoted ☝ Have a great day!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit