#ItsOkayToBeWhite

in tommyrobinson •  6 years ago 


Since the beginning of human evolution, humans have committed all sorts of atrocities and wrongdoings regardless of whatever race or tribe they belonged to, what colour their skin is, or whatever religion they choose to follow. It is human nature to be tribal, tribal competition is coded into our DNA.

The utopian fantasy of everyone in the world living together in absolute harmony is an impossible dream because it counters natural instincts. From a very local level (local football teams despising each other, neighbours bickering), for example, north/south divides through to political/religious and cultural ideology, we are born to stay with who we know and trust and regard 'others' suspiciously or as a threat.

Social scientists also recognise that even when "differences" of race, creed or colour are overcome, there is still a form of "moral tribalism" which usually comes from the nurturing part of growing up, the influence of parents etc.

With all that said and done, and with all the continuing efforts to force a multi-cultural agenda to "respect" humankind's differences, there will always be racial and moralistic differences, it is part of a natural order engraved into human beings evolution.

There is one race, creed and colour that does not gain any benefit from the looney-left multi-cultural politically correct agenda.

White people!

It would seem that it is only "whites" who are made to feel guilty for the sins of their ancestors, only "whites" accused of being 'privileged'. This concerted attack from the left on white people is based on old power structures and specifically on older white men who, at the time, were making decisions to develop and industrialise much of the world. We are now told by the "looney-left" that these old white men have passed down generational guilt, guilt that white people must now suffer and atone for.

Sure we can say there were some terrible things done in our country's colonial history, we can also say there is a lot to be celebrated about it too. Industrialisation, a commonwealth, the rise of capitalist ideas, a free market lifting literally billions of people out of abject poverty.

I am proud to be a mixed race white woman who has the DNA of a white Catholic Glaswegian mother, and the DNA of a Pakistani Muslim father, however, I believe that I must defend my white side, my mother's side, as that seems to be taking a hammering from the mentally ill white-guilt far-left. Plenty enough people are defending and promoting the Pakistani side, I will let the loony tunes from the left cater to that perceived need.

Growing up as a mixed-race girl during a time when there were few mixed-race people was difficult, I experienced racism from both sides.

The Pakistani side never accepted me, for them, I would always be the 'white woman's daughter', and on the white side, I would have a hard time for being brown. In my experience, it was much worse from the Pakistani side than the white side.

My white side of the family was more accepting, they saw beyond my skin colour and my Pakistani father. Of course, others have seen me as a half-breed, a sand nigger or mud. Just more labels to add to the ones I already heard and was called while I was growing up. I am a reminder to them of their race being slowly eradicated. They are morons.

Thankfully apart from social media, I rarely meet people like that in real life.

The Pakistani side is VERY racist, this racism is something we never talk about because ONLY white people can be racist, right?

Many Pakistanis use the word 'gori' when talking about white women, "gori" means fair skin, but is often used to imply white women are easy meat, loose, and with no morals.

It is also common for Pakistanis to loathe black people more than they do white people, many Pakistanis would prefer their children to marry a white person over a black person.

But again, that is something we never hear or talk about?

Pakistanis are jealous of what white people have achieved. They have been in the UK since the 1960s and have been sending their remittances back home. Yet "back home" is mainly still a shithole, there is no significant industry, no roads, and no decent infrastructure. There are however massive mansions dotted across the barren landscape, as political and financial corruption is rife.

Many men do not work; instead, they lounge about all day waiting for UK remittance to arrive or for a visa to allow them entry into the UK, you know the racist UK! When men get visas they more often than not marry their first cousin and inbreed, children are then born with physical deformities and or and mental retardation, all because mommy and daddy and their extended families cant keep it "out of the family". The first cousin Pakistani "woman" is taken out of school, not allowed to finish her education and leads a life of domestic slavery to becomes nothing more than a "baby-making" machine. The UK allows this "cultural diversity", celebrates it even, yet somehow this predominantly white country is racist?

I find it "odd" that such a terribly racist country encourages, welcomes and provides for people from all around the world as they cross through many Non-European and European nations to get here and apply for asylum?

In Great Britain, councillors, MPs and their communities are encouraged to have pride in the national flag of Pakistan, they happily pose and celebrate their Pakistani identity, particularly during the time of Eid.

Unfortunately, a lot of these people claim that the English flag of St George is racist as is the Union Jack? Everyone can have pride in their flag but not white British people? If white British people show any pride, they are shamed, called out as racist and Nazi. Scottish nationalists are not talked about in the same terms as English nationalists, because in England, the far-left always make a beeline comparing them to the likes of the NF or the BNP.

While on the subject of the BNP, I recognise that people in areas of Britain were suffering and still are due to the Islamisation of their communities, and because of child grooming gangs, what political party were they going to turn to? No other political party in the UK discussed that issue, perhaps out of fear of being labelled racist? There is a nuance, maybe even an article for that subject matter on its own. Suffice to say I can understand WHY people would have voted for the BNP, that doesn't make all individuals who voted for them white supremacists or even racist for that matter, people were desperate, and still are, for a solution to these problems. Sure, there are racists involved in the BNP; however, plenty would have voted for them because they were the only political party prepared to do something about these issues. The cowards in parliament have driven people to the fringes because they have nowhere else to go, that is the poison of political correctness.

The far-left cannot or do not want anyone to see national pride in England or the rest of the UK as being "not racist". The far-left utilise this strategy to shame white people, they do this for their own political and cultural supremacist ideals.

A few years back, a white pregnant woman waving the Union Jack flag was stopped by police because apparently a Pakistani man felt insulted by it?

Apparently, the "offensive" flag had a slogan of "no more mosques" emblazoned on it, this probably triggered the Pakistani man. The "no more mosques" argument is for an article another day, that being said let's juxtapose that to massive crowds that gathered in London only a couple or so years ago demanding an Islamic caliphate outside the Syrian embassy. Flags were waved around that were "pro-Taliban", placards that were made by Hizb ut-Tahrir were shaken with the kind of enthusiasm only a fundamentalist could muster. What's more offensive? Islamist supremacists or a moratorium on the building of mosques, which, let's face facts, in a lot of cases promote very Anti-British and Anti-Democratic ideology.

None of those Islamic supremacist signs at that gathering was taken away by police, nobody was detained for that? You would think Islamic supremacists would offend everyone, apparently not!

Islamism and Nazi'ism are opposite sides of the same coin (sorry Tommy I did steal that one from you).

It just shows how different rules apply to different people.

If you are white and make a political statement with a flag you get detained and questioned by the police, then have the "offensive" item confiscated.

If you are a brown Muslim waving "offensive" pro caliphate flags, you are left to get on with it, no intervention by the police whatsoever.

Muslims are selectively "outraged", but that depends on what the message is, yet their constant offence doesn't stop them coming to the UK in huge numbers?

Great Britain is perhaps the least racist country in the world and, in my opinion, far too tolerant. We opened our country to mass immigration, especially so under Labour governments, now as a consequence of those destructive policies, certain areas of the UK have been turned into enclaves that resemble third world Islamic shitholes. Many Muslims refuse to integrate, and many more refuse to work. The burden on British taxpayers is in the billions per annum, with up to 75% of Muslim women out of work or on benefits.

How does that enrich our society?

The Muslim Defence League (MDL) were given a police escort in Oldham where they were marched to a political rally so they could throw bricks and stones at predominantly white families, their intention was clear, it was planned pre-meditated violence, they went to intimidate and disrupt a political campaign. Incredibly the police didn't prevent this happening even though it was organised on Facebook. The police claim it was a "counter-protest" which is strange because there wasn't a protest taking place for them to counter? The Muslim Defence League did not have any banners or placards, just face coverings, eggs, bricks, bottles and scissors to throw at families with young children.

Compare the police treatment of the Muslim Defence League to the police treatment of predominantly white people at 'Free Tommy' events during the summer of last year. The police charged at the crowds using their batons as they did so, they did nothing comparable to the Muslim Defence League, they were left to riot and cause a public disturbance that mainstream media were begging for.

Oh, the headlines the next day - Violence At Tommy Robinsons Political Campaign In Oldham. Like it was Tommy's fault? But that is what the media wanted to portray.

I guess that is because of the "white privilege" we hear so much about.

We hear stories like a racist Muslim man who spat at a white 9-month old baby who then escapes a prison term because he is classed as mentally ill. Perhaps that's because he is a product of "inbreeding"? Shouldn't he be placed in a mental institution, if he has anger issues with a little white baby, then he should not be walking around and mixing with the general population surely?

We hear of a white man who leaves bacon outside a mosque, he is sentenced to 12 months in jail and dies in prison.

White men are raping white girls; the caring left continually remind us that the majority of paedophiles and rapists are white. This is true, but they are typically in isolation and reviled by their community and society as a whole. Gangs of Muslim men are raping white girls, often in large groups which include family members – suggesting cultural and religious acceptance to treat the 'gori' as less than human.

Is that the white privilege we hear about? To be raped by not just sickos in the white community but also by the members of the Pakistani Muslim community too? Where exactly is the "white privilege" of these girls?

Mixed race children are being raised to hate their white parent, but brown is celebrated as stunning and brave, even exotic. The white side is demonised as gammon, racist, knuckle-dragging, colonialist, KKK, Nazi and bigoted!

It's time to stand with our white brothers and sisters and say we are proud to be nationalists, proud of our culture, proud of our incredible achievements and proud of our traditions. If every other race is allowed to be pro-nationalist, then it should be okay for white people too.

That's called equality.

Obviously, I am not going to condone or support any white racist nationalists like the NF and the "real far right" because that is just retarded. It is groups like those who diminish and bring shame to the real meaning and definition of nationalism.

I am proud to be a mixed-race white woman, and if I don't speak out what future is there for my children? I don't want them growing up hating an entire race or a part of themselves.

CAN YOU HELP US REPORT MORE INDEPENDENT NEWS?

(Unsupported https://donorbox.org/embed/going-independent?default_interval=m)


Posted from TR.News with SteemPress : https://www.tr.news/itsokaytobewhite/
Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

I don't think the context came through from the website. It's either that or Mr. Robinson now identifies as a mixed race woman. Not that there's anything wrong with that.

Posted using Partiko Android

It's ok to be any race. It's not like anyone has a choice