RE: Tuesday Musings on Tao Te Ching: Chapter 3 (with special guest @EmancipatedHuman)

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Tuesday Musings on Tao Te Ching: Chapter 3 (with special guest @EmancipatedHuman)

in tuesdaytaoteching •  6 years ago 

So here's my translation:

Not valuing the virtuous person, causes the people not to strive;
Not [holding as] precious rare goods, causes the people not to behave as thieves;
To not see what may be desired, cause the Heart/Mind no confusion.

Therefore the Sage governs by emptying their Heart/Mind, filling their bellies;
When their will is weakened, strengthening their bones.
Always instructs the ignorant people [about] desirelessness.
And enabling those who know to not dare to act.
To act without action, then everything is governed.

When this text was written, it was during a time of immense social and political upheaval. I actually reckon what we're experiencing nowadays parallels what it may have been like in ancient China during this 'Warring States' period. So looking at the wisdom that came from that time/place is really bloody beneficial. Massive kudos for starting this conversation @KennysKitchen and @TheLynx!!

One of the things that many of the thinkers and scholars were lamenting was that 'virtuous people' were not being rewarded or highly esteemed. Instead, government bureaucracies were filled with nepotism, and warlords were ruling local regions, seeking to cause war over resources and land instead of seeking to maintain relationship. Even the traditional rules of combat were being ignored, where armies were engaging in bloody desperate battles instead of following the 'gentlemanly' art of war. So that first line is referring to this. How are people going to want to be the very best, most moral and ethical they can be if the leaders are not modelling it? (This was a massive part of Confucius' philosophy, that if leaders were virtuous, there would be a trickle-down effect).

Interesting again the evidence that these thinkers also observed a connection between desiring/lusting after something, and the confusion it engenders in one's Heart (心 is Heart/Mind, the Heart was seen as the seat of consciousness, not the brain).

I'm still trying to find the evidence for this, but the phrase 虛其心實其腹 "empty their Hearts and fill their abdomen" is an often-used phrase in Taoism, especially in the alchemical schools where it was used to describe the purpose of meditation and qigong practices - I wonder if this is the earliest use of the phrase, as I think it might be. It has a few layers of meaning to it, but in the sense that it was used by the alchemists, it means dropping the attention and energy from the Upper Dantian (head) to the Lower Dantian (abdomen). In practice what we do here is ground ourselves and we become stronger and more stable, therefore less prone to being dropped by an opponent.

But the other aspect of this is that we also drop awareness from being 'intellectual/rational' (thus, logical) to being 'embodied' - where what we know/perceive ceases being logical and reasoned to being more of a 'felt sense'... have you ever felt like you just knew something, and could feel that knowledge from deep within you, even if you couldn't explain it, or provide any evidence or rational reasoning for it? That's what's being referred to here. It's the goal of all alchemical processes in the Taoist tradition. Our intellects/minds can trick us, and are subject to familial and cultural conditioning; but what we know, what awe feel is very real for us. It's the same sense as the Greek 'gnosis'.

There is another possible translation of this phrase, and that is “when their hearts are empty, fill their bellies”. This is consistent with my translation of the following phrase, and makes sense also from the medical perspective. When the heart is empty, it means it lacks 血 xuè blood. Blood is synthesised in the body through the nutrient absorbed from food. So in order to fill the heart with blood, the belly needs to be full — the people need to be fed! This also makes sense that a sage-ruler looks after the health of his citizens by providing them with the resources to be healthy and happy. Again, this seems consistent with the translation of the next part of that sentence. We know from historical documents that many villages were left without able-bodied men to work in the fields as they were dragged off to fight unjust wars, thus there was a drop in agricultural production for the people, with any food produced being sent off to feed troops.

The line 弱其志,強其骨 is a reference to something in medicine. 志 zhì is the Will, and is said to reside in the Kidneys, its one of the 5 aspects of human consciousness. When Kidney-qi is weakened at the physical level, this can affect our capacity to have the strength to persevere — something that happens with people with chronic illness or chronic fatigue. Bones are the tissue governed also by the Kidneys, and is linked also with marrow (the brain is considered to be marrow) and 精 Jīng/Vital Essence. So to strengthen the bones is also to strengthen the marrow, the Kidneys and the Will.

The Sage’s role is to teach the ignorant about how not to desire, and to help those knowledge to not act. And here we have mention of 為無為 wèi wúwéi, ’action-through-nonaction’, the act of effortless action, which is sort of like not acting. This is a direct reference to Confucius, who advocated that rulers and noblemen should behave in this manner. This verse is actually very Confucian, even though Taoism is always touted as being somewhat antagonistic to Confucianism.

I feel this verse comes from a different source than the first chapters. Firstly because its overt Confucian tendencies, but also because it seems more directed to rulers and people in power. It’s more pragmatic than it is mystical (which the first two verses could be seen as).

Imagine if we did have governments that focussed on providing the needs of their people instead of wasting resources on fighting stupid wars over territorial pissing rights?! I know at least here in Australia, we a re fed up with our national leaders behaving like spoilt, entitled children in the playground. And then now wonder the people aren't inspired to be their best, that we have a generation of youth who simply don't give a flying fuck.

I love this verse, I think it holds a lot of relevance for us today.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

What I really appreciate about the phrasing of your translation is that it seems to emphasize that people rise (or fall) according to the container within which they live, and the importance, therefore, of leaders crafting a social system which will set people up for peace and fulfillment.

I've been thinking a lot lately about power, violence, social systems, and human nature, so this is in keeping with my current understanding of why people do the things that they do. I especially enjoyed your explanation of Heart/Mind and breakdown of the phrase "empty their Hearts and fill their abdomen".

Thank you for your thoughtful and insightful commentary, and historical contextualization!

I'm pretty sure that was the concern of all the thinkers and schools of thought in ancient, pre-imperial China.

The Tao Te Ching is so much more than a mystical text - in many regards I think its highly political and somewhat revolutionary (in the sense of inciting disruption to the political status quo).

I mean, I would argue that any form of personal gnosis would free an individual from being controlled by media, government, etc. However I would say that Taoism at large has probably been the single biggest influence on me to think/believe that.... so maybe biased and conditioned to think that? HAHA

Here's where a text like this becomes relevant for us today:
In ancient China, it was presupposed that it was the King/Emperor's duty to be moral, and thus a trickle-down effect would occur. This is such an old-school social perspective however.
But the same principle can still apply in a democracy, and I would argue with greater effect.

Because in a democracy every single individual citizen is the sovereign, not just the dude at the top! It becomes our responsibility to be the best versions of ourselves we can be, to then influence how our elected, chosen representatives do the business of running a government (for the people!!) In a sense, it becomes a trickle-up effect (hopefully).

Would people still make choices based in fear and self-interest towards personal security if they felt like they were sovereign beings, I wonder?