There are certain ways of human behavior and established standards in so-called "civilized societies" that are unanimous all around the world, guidelines most of us seem to have taken for granted so much so that we hardly recognize their artificial nature anymore.
It's so intriguing to see the discussions out in the public, on the internet and in the media machine about all the shenanigans that go on on the world stage. We are taught a certain image of how the world supposedly works, we are told narratives that lead us to a certain assumption about how the human system operates and what the socio-economic structure is made of. But often we find peculiar aspects about that image, dare I say discrepancies, oddities that don't really seem to fit at all, precisely because with surprisingly many topics and issues there is an almost mythical degree of unanimity between allegedly opposing players, meaning everyone suddenly agrees to one consent. Media narratives, political argumentations and the general sense of the population who believe it.
These unanimous agreements can not only be found mostly anywhere in the world these days, but I purport they are in fact part of the same machine, signatures of the same mind-control at work. The handwriting of the gang (whoever the gang is).
We are presented with the underlying notion that "countries" operate according to their own self-interests and that they are often in conflict with one another. The political arena is full of verbal brawls and differences in opinion (especially from one part of the world to another) yet there are topics that outright scream at us to make us pay attention because fundamental plurality of opinions simply can not be shown to exist there, despite the glaringly different backgrounds of those parts of the world in terms of culture, customs and history.
Since I have thought a great deal about these weird instances of unanimity between allegedly opposing players on the world stage I have been wanting to write about some of the examples on this blog, just to showcase how our broad systemic assumptions are in fact not supported by the evidence; how our perception tells a different tale than the stories and contemporary myths we have been taught.
I will not be able to point out all the discrepancies I see because some might not yet belong in the public arena. Instead I want to talk about the aspects that are plain for all to witness but may have never entered into the questioning consciousness of people who - despite all their ernesty in analyzing the political and socio-economic landscape of our times in the hopes of being better prepared for what is coming down the road - may have never had the luxury of thinking these over with enough scope.
As far as I am concerned these unanimous aspects are a great signpost that points to a broader underyling structure of the matrix, a level of interwoven-ess that everyone already knows about but has failed to include in their own efforts to understand the world we are living in.
As such, this series will feature some of these unanimous threads I see playing out in the hopes that we can gather even more of them and to start realizing that something else may be going on. All the speculation in the world about motives and interests of the world stage players is worth nothing if we disregard evidence to a different set of relationships and since there is as much attention as ever placed on the same popular themes even by those who have long started questioning the world around them I think it is high time I wrote about this to spark some ideas less discussed in the public realm.
Not to say they have not been discussed anywhere, but an unfactual basis for our interpretations can only lead to unfactual conclusions more akin to the narratives we wanted to break free from then we would like.
This introduction has gotten way longer than I planned on, we'll start with unanimous object of conduct number 1 "compulsive clothing" tomorrow <3
unsplash.com