US Attorney General is confusing fictional statutes and regulations with Spiritual, Natural Law.

in ungrip •  6 years ago  (edited)

Governments LOVE to take children away from parents.  It does not matter if the kids are at the border or CPS is at your door, it is morally and ethically repugnant and wrong.  It is NOT the way to love thy neighbour.  It destroys families, creates chaos, pain, anger, suffering and dependency.  The state needs people in pain and to be completely dependent on the state in order to continue their evil campaign to control the world.

Jeff Sessions is the US Attorney General and he went public with this repugnant LIE.  I encourage you to view the video as he used the Bible to justify the actions of the state.  

Why is Romans 13:1 used by government thugs to convince people to surrender to their authority?  Because the lie works due to peoples own ignorance.  I will demonstrate this lie one more time.  I spoke about it in my book and in posts I've written over the years.  Here is what the passage says from one of the newer "translations" of the bible (The New International Version is very similar  to this one): 

Let every person be subject to the governing authorities.  For there is no authority except by God's appointment, and the  authorities that exist have been instituted by God. - New English  Translation (2005)

I have no doubt that Jeff Sessions was quoting this bible or one very similar to it.  If I was to take this version word for word, it would appear that we are indeed supposed to submit to the government.  This is why people in authority love quoting this line as it justifies their actions as their authority was instituted by God.  But let's dig a bit deeper and look at a translation that is a bit older. 

 Let every soul be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and the authorities that exist are appointed by God. - New King James Version (1982)

What I see here is that the wording has changed from soul to person which shows me that a significant switch was made years ago when the newer bibles were written.  The difference between a soul and a person is significant and profound as one is non-corporal and the other is corporal.  Two completely different jurisdictions.  But I'm not satisfied, I want to dig deeper. 

 Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God. - King James Version (1611)

Now this is where things get VERY interesting.  What this version is saying is that there is no power but God's.  This is not saying anything about government at all but instead is talking about 'higher powers'.  That could mean government, but it could also mean something VERY different.  But I'm still not satisfied.  I want to dig deeper.  To do that I need a tool called 'Strong's Concordance'.  It is a book that allows me to look at even older versions.  The Old Testament was  translated from Hebrew, the New Testament from Greek.  Yes, there are other translations in other languages, but I have no experience going that far back.  For me, Strong's Concordance is sufficient and allows me to look up these words in those texts. The word soul is translated from the Greek word: ψύχω / psychē which means: 

breath, life, a living soul, the soul as an essence which differs from the body and is not dissolved by death (distinguished from other parts of the body). (source link here)

From my book and previous posts, I proved that 'person' is defined as the body MINUS the mind and spirit.  The newer bibles use the word person, but this definition makes it VERY clear that it is talking about the non-corporal aspect of our being, the living soul, the spirit and true essence of who we are.  The spirit is immortal, while our body (person) is mortal.  The translators made the switch to try and take something that was not theirs!  Making a switch like that is fraud and stern warnings were placed in the bible warning people what would happen if shit like this was done. This passage does not address the corporal beings, but instead addresses the non-corporal beings, our spirit!  Now that the spiritual jurisdiction, scope and context has been established, we can look at the next two important words 'higher power'. The word higher comes from the Greek word ὑπέρ / hyperechō which means: 

 to have or hold over one, to stand out, rise above, overtop (source link here)

The word 'power' comes from the Greek word ἔξεστι / exousia which means: 

Power of choice, liberty of doing as one pleases.  Leave or  permission.  The ability or strength with which one is endued.  The  power of authority (influence) and of right (privilege).  The power of rule or government. (source link here)

Context is so very important when we are looking up definitions of words.  We have to be forever vigilant to make sure we don't misinterpret what the author is trying to say.  We already put the context well into the Spiritual Realm by defining the word 'soul'.  So now we are confronted with the meaning of 'higher power' which is to have or hold over, to stand out, rise above the power of choice & liberty to influence.  I absolutely refuse to consider government in this context as it is a fictional construct with no spirit as it is a dead entity (corporation) that governs over feudal serfs, not spiritual beings.  If the word person was used in the original text, then it would make perfect sense, but it was not used.  Even if I did use this definition, we are supposed to "stand out and rise above" it which further invalidates the modern interpretations in modern bibles! 

By digging deep I've just determined that a passage that has been used to convince people to surrender to the authority of the state actually talks about people exercising the power of choice and liberty that was granted to them by God (the highest power).  That is completely opposite of what the government thugs convince people to do.  This type of shit happens all throughout the bible.  Why? Because kings needed it to justify their power and authority over people because they need obedience in order to rule.  They lied to gain order and obedience by translating the bible to manipulate the message to fit their own agendas.  The king's men are lying again to justify the violent and abusive actions against children, families and our tribes!   

Jeff Sessions is the US Attorney General and he should also know that even within their system, there is this little thing called due processes.  You might also know it as being innocent until proven guilty.  The government is subject to the 'laws' that he claims to govern.  The constitution and the laws that make it up are there to put the government thugs in the box, not people.  However, they get away with it because people don't know how to use those tools to gain control and obedience of the state.  The people are the authority here on this planet, not the other way around.  Learn how to stand on your own authority and power.  Put these lying thugs back into the box that they put themselves into.  I don't care how people justify the actions and behaviours of thugs who take children away from their families, it is morally, ethically and spiritually wrong to do so.  It is our responsibility to step up and protect our selves and our children from those who engage in evil, violent acts against spirit and violate spiritual law.

If Jeff Sessions read a little bit further down the page that he quoted, he would have read:

For this, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Thou shalt not covet; and if [there be] any other commandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, namely, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. Love worketh no ill to his neighbour: therefore love [is] the fulfilling of the law. - Rom 13:9-10

Jeff Sessions, did you see that?  Thou shalt not steal?  That means you are not to steal kids, not lie about it and not covet that which other people have.  If you truly loved thy neighbour, you would be doing something to help all those people, like stop sending in spy's, jackals and saboteurs in to destabilize other countries or bombing the shit out of them which causes refugees and large waves of people emigrating from their destroyed home lands.  The right to rule the kingdoms of the world falls within the devil's domain as I outlined in my previous post.  The state laws are not ordained by Creator but rather the devil.  Careful who you worship!

But I'm no idiot.  I know that your goons are under orders to do this work in order fulfill your puppet masters plans to solidify their control over the people of the world.  I stand as a witness to your treachery.  You speak of your law, but that is not the law that we are to be following.  We are to follow Spiritual Law, not fictional constructs created by man.  It is spiritual law that we are to fulfill and that is done by loving our neighbours as ourselves.  That is what this passage speaks of as you stood behind that podium and lied.  The lie was so large you mumbled over the words.  

Jeff Sessions, I forgive you and your masters.  I love you despite the evil acts that you engage in.  I cannot sit here and not speak up for all those people that you are hurting and violating.  I share this in the hopes that all those around you and currently under your jurisdiction will realize the truth and emancipate themselves from your tyranny.  

 My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge - Hosea 4:6

Knowledge and awareness is our weapon, the pen being mightier than your sword.  By declaring peace, no longer participating in your tyranny and engaging in peaceful non-compliance, we will win as your empire crumbles under it's own stench, rot and moral decay.  The people will discover that they have the power and authority granted to them by Creator to govern themselves, find peace within and bring prosperity to this planet for all life, not just your greedy, repugnant masters.  Shame on all of you who participate or support the state and their violent, abusive actions!

My next few posts will help people with tools to set the boundaries and put them back into the box.  I've written about it before, but we need to cover it all again!  

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  
Thank-you @wwf for submitting this post with the #familyprotection tag. It has been UPVOTED by @familyprotection and RESTEEMED TO OUR Community Supporters.

"Child Protection Agencies" are taking children away from their loving families.
THESE FAMILIES NEED PROTECTING.

(If you feel that our community has brought more rewards and attention to this post, please consider contributing a portion of those rewards back to our cause.)

Feudal lords and religious leaders have twisted the Creator's words all through time in order to gain control. Keep the people poor and uneducated, sick and weak, then they will not challenge what is blatantly wrong according to what the Creator ordained. Knowledge and awareness of what is happening around us is a powerful weapon in conquering feudal masters.

What an amazingly clear explanation of Romans 13:1 . I think I have searched all my life for that, as the traditional view never rested easily upon my conscience. Another one that has never felt right is Mark 12:17 , "Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's". KJV. This seems to suggest that we should unconditionally pay whatever taxes the state dreams up. Hmmm. What do you think?

  ·  6 years ago (edited)

Thank you. I've written about that passage in the past too. The way I see it, if Caesar created it, then give it to him. If God created it, then give it to him. Caesar represents the fictional constructs that we call the 'state'. If we surrender to the state, aka "Caesar", and swear fealty to him, then we abandon God for another master. Caesar created his own money, statutes and regulations. If he is our master through our own choice to be his feudal serf, then we owe fealty to him (the state). However, if we reject Caesar and instead embrace God as our master, as we should, then we render our time and energy to God instead. Caesar represents the fictional constructs while the physical realm is created by the Spiritual Realm, all of which belongs to God.

With that said, we can only have one master. It is our choice on which master we have in our lives. We must then render to our master depending on which one we choose. I rejected the state, Caesar and all their fictional constructs and instead dedicate my mind, body and spirit to Creator! When I declared peace and walked away from being a feudal serf of Caesar, I no longer had any duty to render onto Caesar the things that are Caesar's as I was no longer in possession of anything that was Caesar's! I refused all benefits or privileges that was offered by the state so that I no longer had to render anything to it. However, my body, the land, air, water, plants and animals all belong to Creator, so I am more than happy to be a sacred steward of all his creation as we were commanded to do. My time then is rendered onto God of my own free will. I have no duty to give Caesar any of my time as he is no longer my master. I have nothing to render to him!

I think you will enjoy my book.

https://steemit.com/book/@wwf/graduating-life-with-honours-full-book-with-links-to-each-chapter

that is what it says and it is a good idea to pay your taxes. Then and now, the only two things that are certain are death and taxes.

Very powerful post @wwf, nice read. Jeff Sessions is that same prick who struck down the weed laws as soon as they passed.

False, there were no weed laws passed and Jeff Sessions cannot strike down laws. Jeff Sessions did rescind many extrajudicial memos among them was an Obama era memo about cannabis enforcement, this memo was redundant. Despite NPR claiming Sessions was initiating a crackdown both of the experts on their show said very clearly that it was no such thing. Rescinding that memo had no effect on the status of cannabis law enforcement. We can tell because that was a long time ago and the feds in fact have not been cracking down on legal weed dispensaries have they?

There is a bill currently in process to legalize weed on the federal level and President Trump has pledged to sign it.

  ·  6 years ago (edited)

“False!”

The Obama administration had it set in place where each individual state could police themselves. Hence the favorable laws. Jeff Sessions squashed the idea and enforced federal laws on each individual state.

But your efforts have been noted - Thank you!

The Obama administration had it set in place where each individual state could police themselves. Hence the favorable laws. Jeff Sessions squashed the idea and enforced federal laws on each individual state.

You are still incorrect, the memo didn't set in place that each individual state could police themselves, it was redundant and extrajudicial and along with many other Obama orders it was rescinded. There was absolutely no effect from rescinding that memo. Jeff Sessions squashed the idea that laws should be made by the president instead of congress and had zero impact on federal cannabis enforcement in the process. That was many months ago now, there was and is no crackdown.

If there was a crackdown then there ought to be a crackdown, where is the crackdown? Why aren't we seeing dispensary raids every day?
We are not seeing them because you are wrong.

  ·  6 years ago (edited)

6D256211-8BA4-406D-B576-C100926F3B39.jpeg
https://www.theroot.com/jeff-sessions-vs-marijuana-the-federal-court-battle-b-1823057160

Are we finished now? Thanks.

F Jeff Sessions. You can be an advocate of the self righteous, bible misrepresenting prick all you want. But he squashed my favorable weed laws, period.

Prior to jeff Sessions: I walk in the store, buy a bag, walk out and I even had dedicated smoking sections.

Post jeff Sessions: I walk in the store, buy a bag and upon exiting, authorities have the legal right to arrest me because inside the shop is state ran and the sidewalk is federal.

So the raids you’re referring to are actually taking place, they just wait until you exit the store with the product you legally purchased inside the store.

We could be all done, you just proved my point for me, I started off saying that the media was making such false claims months ago. That is a good example of one. What you need to prove there is a crackdown is hit me with articles about all the dispensaries being raided by the FEDs, you know, like a crackdown.
So your article was from February, fearmongering the impending crackdown, a great example of hype like NPR was pushing. Yet the experts kept trying to tell the host on NPR that this was not actually a crackdown and would not effect law enforcement or your pot shopping experience.

Let me get this right, your article about someone suing Jeff Sessions is evidence of a federal crackdown on pot?

Where is you pot shop that the sidewalk is federal property?

Since Jeff's crackdown how many times have the federal authorities picked you up on the sidewalk on pot charges?

Zero right?

There was never a time when it was legal to possess cannabis on federal property, even when the memo was in effect, it of course had nothing to do with that.

Hint: if there was a federal crackdown, if the federal policy of not busting those who are complying with their state laws had changed in any way, there wouldn't be a fucking pot store!
There would be a busted out store front where a pot store once was.

Your boy hates weed.

30758AB9-8F50-425E-8885-37EA5CA81EEF.jpeg

Your boy hates weed. Repeat: Jeff Sessions is not pro marijuana.

derp, I am sure I never said he liked weed, or that he was my boy, I also never said that he was pro marijuana. Did you forget what we were talking about or are you just doing some straw man arguing?
What you failed again and again to prove is your old fake news claim that there is a federal crackdown on legal marijuana. Try to focus. Again, what you need is a article about nationwide busts on legal cannabis businesses, but you can't because there are not any.

You could also try to prove that Sessions overturned some laws like you had claimed earlier

he squashed my favorable weed laws, period.

which ones and how did the AG "squash" them?

Separation of church and state would prevent all this confusion. Session's job is not to execute God's law, he is supposed to defend the Law of the Land, man's law, the Constitution and the US Code.

I replied to another post on this and I am not typing this all over again...
Yep. I keep asking people, no one answers... If I decide to do something I KNOW is illegal, say rob a bank. Now, I think the FED is a criminal enterprise, our fiat currency is against the Constitution, these banks are evil and I do not approve of them, but I do know robbing them is illegal. Still, I am going to rob it and I am taking my child with me because I have the moral high ground here...
Well, people with GUNS come after me so I hop in the car and take off, and while luding police I wreck my car and injure my child...
IS THIS THE BANK'S FAULT?!

I am all about self-governance. If we are ready to have that talk, then set the illegal immigrants loose! However, if people want a GOVERNMENT to "keep them safe" THIS IS HOW THAT IS DONE.

They broke the law, the knew they were breaking the law, and they decided to bring kids along...

exactly, it's sad to see otherwise reasonable people so snookered by this obvious ploy to distract and upset people.

I think it is an error to suggest that Session is defending the 'Law of the Land'. The law he is defending is the law of the sea. The 'country' he is acting as Attorney General for, is nothing but a corporation. Session is a feudal servant following orders from his feudal masters who have usurp the land and enslaved the people upon that land. The border they are trying to protect is nothing but a corporate line on a map. They were able to do that through ignorance as they acquired consent from the people to being governed by these masters. The 'laws' that he is protecting is ones created by the feudal masters 'society' that was created by a small group of men.

So you asked the question:

If I decide to do something I KNOW is illegal ...

There is a huge difference between doing something that is 'illegal' and 'unlawful'. Doing something illegal assumes that you consented to being governed by a fictional construct we call 'government'. If you consent to be governed by those man made fictional constructs, then you agree to be subject to their rules. If you steal from the fed, that is a violation of their statutes and regulations which you agreed to be subject to. As such you are responsible for the outcomes of your actions.

However, stealing from the Fed it is also unlawful because spiritual law dictates that we are not to steal. If you flee and hurt your child, then you are responsible.

Your whole scenario is full of violence which violates spiritual law. However, if you revoke your consent to being governed by them, declare peace and be peaceful, then you are fulfilling spiritual law even though your actions may violate their statutes and regulations on a daily basis. Because you are no longer governed by them, all of that becomes irrelevant because it does not apply to you.

To be clear, the states monopoly on coercion and violence does not give it a free pass when it comes to spiritual laws. People consenting to be governed by that military force does not give them a free pass either. The state claims that they can engage in coercion and violence in order to maintain their power, statutes and regulations. Suggesting that people violated their statutes and regulations still does not validate their violent and abusive behaviour. Violence is violence, no matter what authority said it was legal.

Just because something is legal does not make it lawful. Legal is almost always violent, abusive and coercive, due to the nature of the state. That is why spirit lead people cannot participate with that shit. It violates spiritual law by its very nature. That is why I often write about how it is the domain of the devil.

If people want the government to 'keep them safe', then so be it. But that is not going to stop me from confronting people on the fact that the government is violent, abusive and evil. I will not go to war against those who engage in this violence. However, I will rebuke everyone involved for participating in that shit. I will stand as a witness to the violence as none of this demonstrates what love thy neighbour is all about.

I am a bit surprised you failed to see the "Devil's advocate" argument I am making, perhaps you did not read to the end?
I do not support any of this nonsense, I am an advocate of self governance. The people who DEMAND a government to keep them safe need to accept the FULL responsibility for the consequences of their choices... This is how a government protects its people.

Actually I did read to the very end. In fact I read it two or three times. It did not come across that way to me. I saw your comment about self-governance, but I did not 'see' your "devil's advocate" argument in the way it was presented.

I agree with you. If people DEMAND that the government keep them safe, they must also recognize that they are petitioning the state to engage in violence against others to do that. That means any violence that takes place, whether it be children being ripped from the arms of their parents, bombs dropping on villages, etc is also the responsibility of the people as well as those who physically do the act of violence.

It is also the peoples responsibility to ask questions to ensure they get full disclosure so that they can get informed consent. The vast majority fail to do that and few fail to know how to do it.

I admit I am feeling pretty cynical at this point, but this... "I am all about self-governance. If we are ready to have that talk, then set the illegal immigrants loose! However, if people want a GOVERNMENT to "keep them safe" THIS IS HOW THAT IS DONE."

2 Timothy 2:15 invites us to use the word of truth well, and for this it is necessary to scrutinize and study as you have indited in the matter. It is sad that the masses are manipulated with the word of God, and that for lack of knowledge many people die and are dragged by evil minds. Authority descends from God but if that authority is not subject to God its authority is only temporary, earthly and diabolical, used to do more evil than good.

Yes. We each have authority that descended from God. The problem rests when we fail to accept that authority and instead grant it to somebody else. It is our responsibility to not only accept that authority but learn how to use it in a peaceful, non-violent way so that we can bring peace and prosperity to the planet. However, feudal masters have created a framework to take on all that power and authority from those who refuse to govern themselves. As a result, all that power is now being centralized and corrupts anybody who gets near it. That is where the evil is created. Indeed very diabolical!

That was an excellent article. Jeff Sessions is the epitomy of the self centered, money grubbing, pretentious, racist nazi administration. I can't speak for other Christians, but I find his Biblicle reference to be a deliberate deception and an insult to all citizens.

God bless Jeff Sessions, he is a very brave man, hopefully he remains steadfast and true to his duty to enforce the laws. So you don't think there are any circumstances where kids should be taken from their parents?

We have failed the parents and the young. The violence within the families is due to a complete breakdown in our traditional family structures that manifested from colonization. We were never meant to raise our young by ourselves. Raising young was a clan or even a tribe activity. Taking kids away with violence only perpetuates that cycle. Instead, we need to engage at a completely different level to not only help the young but help all the members of the tribe to work through these problems. Violence is not the answer.

You didn't answer my question.

Indeed I did answer the question. Work harder to comprehend what I just said.

Ok, it sounded like a "no", is that a "no"? So if someone is raping or starving their children then they should not have their children removed from them?

I answered that question already. The community needs to step up and help them all. But who wants to get involved these days? These scenarios are a symptoms of a much deeper issue ... the breakdown of our families, clan, tribes and nations. Those need to be rebuilt so that people know what to do when problems arise within our families AND the support is there to deal with it in a loving way. This is not a 'yes' or 'no' aka black & white type response. The black and white thinking is more in line with colonial, statist type thinking. Spirit does not work in this way.

The people harming others are themselves hurting. They need healing and protecting just as much as the children do. The solutions to end the violence will NOT be found by taking kids away. Will interventions be required? Obviously. But my first response is not to engage in violence to answer other peoples violence. There are peaceful, active, loving things that can be done to help everyone involved and end the violence. We cannot answer violence with violence. We must answer violence with peace, love, compassion, understanding, healing, freedom and empathy. Otherwise we just perpetuate the violence. Taking kids away from their parents is cultural genocide. But the state or those who support the state does not seem to have a problem with that.

No, fuck people who hurt their kids. You can have compassion for them, that's your choice. I think they should be executed. Lets send a bunch of child rapists to live in your neighborhood and see how you like having them around your kids.

No, fuck people who hurt their kids. You can have compassion for them, that's your choice. I think they should be executed. Lets send a bunch of child rapists to live in your neighborhood and see how you like having them around your kids. Some cultures, those that permit child abuse, should be destroyed. There is no place for those cultures.

An extreme attitude my friend. Did you know that I was once a very abusive dad myself? I did not sexually abuse my kids, but I did engage in emotional and mental abuse. It was through the compassion and confrontation of my community that I surrendered my old ways to learn how to have a much healthier relationship with my self, my wife, kids, family and friends. I worked for YEARS to reconcile my relationship with them all and now I stand here as an advocate for peace, freedom, tough love, prosperity, love and compassion. I know that people can be healed and helped. How many people are willing to write people off like me and execute them? I am deeply saddened by your black and white view of these issues.

I also find it interesting that this conversation started with you asking about kids being taken from their parents but now you justify the behaviour by sending a bunch of child rapists to live in my neighbourhood. If any such people moved in, I would physically put myself between the abuser and those being abused. I've done it in the past when I stood between a 300lb physically abusive man and his wife & 8 kids. I would do it again in a heart beat. That is what it means to be in a family, clan or tribe. While you may not be able to relate to what I speak of, I do know that what I do works and I've helped protect many kids as a result ... without having to resort to violence to take them away or get the state involved. There are options ... if people are willing to get involved and participate in the solutions. I refuse to let the state do that job as it does a horrible job doing it. I rebuke you or your lack of compassion to help everyone. Your views sadden my greatly. If you ran the government I would have been killed in 2000 and we would not be having this conversation. That is a horrible thought. I pray that your heart softens so that you can find within yourself the capacity to look past the violence and start to address the root causes of these issues. We are not to judge these people but instead help them. How Creator judges us will be based on our actions in this life time. I choose non-violence as it forces me to be creative to solve the problems we face peacefully rather than resorting to violence. Violence is NOT the answer.

This post was upvoted and resteemed by @thethreehugs. Thank you for your support of @familyprotection.