RE: [Hapramp] [0.0.7] Profile with no Name and About text shows N/A

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

[Hapramp] [0.0.7] Profile with no Name and About text shows N/A

in utopian-io •  6 years ago 

Same "code" as your comment. Would you argue your comment is a syntax in a programming language?

Copy writing is anything that has to do with the text applications and websites show to their users as part of the UI. Changing a word that means "No data" to an actual representation of no data, is not a change in the code we consider a valid contribution in the category. I can't speak for the P.O, if he wanted to give feedback - he should provided some context in the commit, or in the issue you submitted.

I'm sorry if you're disappointed, I can understand your frustration, but there is nothing I can do. It's just not a bug. It worked as expected - showing the exact text the code told it to, when there is no data to show. In other words, what you consider a bug, was there by design. Like I said, as he agreed with the proposed change, I can't deny this is a valid contribution to the project - but per our guidelines, it is not a bug.


Need help? Write a ticket on https://support.utopian.io/.
Chat with us on Discord.
[utopian-moderator]

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Before i reply, Below response is not so I get reviewed.

The example you presented above is data. Its not part of github so not a code.

Reason for my disappointment is not this issue or this review but how the category is operating in general. I think i should be frank about it now:

  1. Category has been modified to expect proposing a solution. In corporate world, no tester ever provides a bug fix. Thats the task of a developer. How many technologies do you think a person can code and debug in.

  2. Even after an issue is accepted by a PO, there's a 50/50 chance that it will get considered by utopian because one of the 2 reasons

  • Its not an issue because it doesn't fall into the category.
  • Its too little to be rewarded even though there is an option to mark something Negligible fix which rewards with 5$ up vote. I don't know whats small than that.
  1. Inconsistent definitions for the questions.
    For example: If a PO has accepted an issue after it was posted to utopian, some mods consider it as not accepted by PO while other consider it as being accepted by PO if it was accepted before the review.

I hope to don't take it personally because I am not trying to single out any one person here, I am just providing insight on what I feel as a contributor.

CC: @sachincool, @fego, @tobias-g
Marking you guys CC so maybe it helps the category in some way.