RE: Suggestion for eSteem Surfer: Improvements to the user search feature

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Suggestion for eSteem Surfer: Improvements to the user search feature

in utopian-io •  6 years ago 

Thanks for the review @syedumair...

However, considering that the P.O has acknowledged it as "high-priority", your rating seems a bit unfair.

You tagged it as minor improvement, fine I agree even though I wonder what you will tag a suggestion like "Adding label to user's name".

I wonder how it manages not to have any direct relation to the purpose of the project.

You said the mockups are poor? Can you kindly explain why it is so.

The overall presentation is average... Despite the clear headings and clear writings I used? What else was I supposed to write there?

I read someplace where another user complained about your rating. Please don't make this seem the norm.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Thank you for asking questions! I am more than happy to answer them for you.

  1. No doubt, PO marked your suggestion as high priority but that does not mean you will get a high score for suggesting a small enhancement.

  2. This suggested feature is a minor improvement because it does not impact the functionality or usability significantly. It is just a slight enhancement.

  3. The main purpose of the purpose of the project is to provide an alternative interface for steemit, that is posting, commenting and upvoting along with the "transfers". Anything related to the above mentioned functions is in direct relation with the project.

  4. The mock-ups aren't bad but they aren't of excellent quality as well. Mock-ups could have been better if you had used high quality images. Your mock-ups don't retail their original quality upon zooming. You could have used multiple mock-ups also.
    I would still say that your mock-ups aren't poor but I had to choose between excellent and poor.

  5. The title of the contribution should briefly explain the suggested feature which was missing.
    In the "proposal description" section you are supposed to write the description of your proposal, not the problem.

Recently, eSteem releases a new update to its eSteem Surfer app for laptops and desktop devices running on the Windows and Linux operating system.

It should be released instead of releases and if it is laptops, it should be desktops.
This is just the first sentence of your contribution, there are a few more grammatical errors in your contribution.
Please keep in mind thataverage is the second best option to choose and that is not as bad as it sounds.

I am sure, I have answered all your questions with good detail but if you still have any doubts, feel free to reply back to the comment or reach out to help channel on our discord.