It certainly is much easier to do that rather than engage in debate and prove your opponent wrong.
RE: Voices for the Victims
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Voices for the Victims
Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
she doesnt need to "prove" anything.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Correct. Nor do I need to be forced to see her posts and automatically agree with everything.
And if I disagree, I don't need to stay silent.
So she exercises her rights, and I exercise mine.
Sounds fair to me.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Why is it so important to you?
Because while you are shitting on sjw tatics you are doing the exact same thing.
Most of your disagreements are bullshit/fallices and have nothing to do with the post just meant to enrage the poster.
Not sure if it was you (on mobile) but why is it consider proof she is lying because she is sharing her experience and recieving money? God forbid a victim recieves something benefical for speaking out about abuse. People need money to survive and there is no way I would use that to shame others, its silly.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Hello roninwoods, thanks for the comment.
Would you mind elaborating on which SJW tactics I am using?
When you say "most of my disagreements" are bullshit, what do you mean by that? That you don't agree with them?
I reply not to enrage the poster, but to stimulate debate about something that I believe is wrong. It may enrage you and all the other sensitive commenters who insist on resorting to ad-hominem attacks and downvoting to silence a voice of dissent.
But you are conflating when you say that I post to enrage. Causality, causality.
To address the final part of your comment, I challenge you or anyone who cares to, to go and read my posting history, and find a post where I say @lauralemons is lying.
If you invest the time, you will come to realize I never said - or implied - such thing.
Take it for what it is, but it is interesting this was her first assumption .. that I had accused her of lying.
While we may disagree on the following (I, for one, have no trouble with disagreement and different points of view ;)), it seems immoral, dubious and inauthentic that she is attempting to profit from her victimization.
It's clearly a conflict of interest - in my opinion.
And in much the same way she can decide to post on the internet for all to see about anything she wants, I too can post my opinions in response. Someone else in the thread said it right, this is not a blog with comments disabled, it's a two-way street.
Some people are not gonna like what some other people write, how could it ever be any other way?
You see, the difference is that I still want @stellabelle and @lauralemons to post their opinions, they want mine silenced.
At some point, you've gotta ask why.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit