On The Iraq War’s 15th Anniversary, Make The World Remember Its Lessons

in war •  7 years ago  (edited)

You remember where you were when you heard the news about the 9/11 attacks? Do you remember the terrible feeling of shock in your guts that innocent people were suffering?

How about what you were doing when the first bombs hit at the beginning of the Iraq invasion? Do you remember that one? Or did that memory get lost in the shuffle?

US and coalition forces began their “shock and awe” bombing campaign on March 20th, 2003. That’s less than fifteen years. It just happened, and people have already forgotten about it.

Fifteen years. I still have unused art supplies that are older than that. And yet when politicians and intelligence agencies say that Russia has committed an act of war against the US and Bashar al-Assad needs to be removed from power in Syria, mainstream Americans say "Yup, sounds about right, no further evidence required."


This needs to stop. We must all use this landmark anniversary to remind the world of the depravity of the US-centralized empire, and how we know for a fact that it will happily use lies and mass media propaganda to manufacture support for acts of military violence which unleash unspeakable horrors into our world.

The Iraq invasion is unforgivable. It killed a million Iraqis, gave rise to murderous terrorist factions, and destabilized the entire region in a way that it continues to suffer from to this day. The destruction and human misery it caused are immeasurable. If every war hawk in Washington were forced to truly witness and experience every last horror the war inflicted with their eyes pried open a la Clockwork Orange, they would be forever shattered and rendered incapable of doing any more harm.

The Iraq invasion is unforgivable. It warped what we are as a species. It stained us. Nobody who helped inflict this murderous abomination upon our world should have been permitted to work in politics, government or media ever again, and its primary facilitators should be in prison for war crimes. The fact that its chief architects remain not just free but celebrated members of society proves that we are ruled by a sociopathic empire.

The Iraq invasion is unforgivable, and absolutely nothing has been done to prevent it from happening again. Nobody suffered any consequences, no changes have been made, no transparency measures or checks and balances put in place to ensure that the US war machine is never again permitted to paint the earth red with the blood of the innocent in an act of mass murder justified with lies.

Nothing has been done to prevent this from happening again, and indeed it is happening again. The US war machine has been lying to us about what is going on in Syria, Iraq's next-door neighbor. It has been funneling money and weapons to known terrorist factions in that country for years. It has established a permanent military presence there with the stated goal of effecting regime change. Half a million people have died already because of the empire's relentless destabilization campaigns in that country. And, just like Iraq, it is done under the pretense of humanitarianism while really being all about resources. The only difference is it's being done predominantly with violent militia groups and drones this time, to prevent people from remembering Iraq.

Meanwhile, we still have seen no clear evidence that the Russian government interfered in the US elections in any meaningful way, and there's even less evidence that it penetrated the highest levels of US government as alleged in the "collusion" narrative. After well over a year of shrieking about Russia with steadily increasing shrillness, we still have the same amount of proof that we started with: zero. And yet the shrieking is getting louder and increasingly more urgent.

This is despite the fact that this administration has already killed Russians in Syria, greatly escalated nuclear tensions with Russia, allowed the sale of arms to Ukraine (a move Obama refused for fear of angering Moscow), forced RT and Sputnik to register as foreign agents, expanded NATO, assigned Russia hawk Kurt Volker as special representative to Ukraine, shut down a Russian consulate in San Francisco and thrown out Russian diplomats, along with the aforementioned US regime change occupation of Syria. Despite all this, mainstream politicians on both sides of the aisle are calling for more escalations. All without a shred of the kind of evidence that we should be demanding in a post-Iraq invasion world.

The debates over the establishment Russia and Syria narratives are an argument between those who learned the lessons of Iraq, and those who did not. We must help everyone to learn.

We barely survived the last cold war. The similarities between Iraq and Syria are so striking you'd have to be willfully blind not to see them. There is every incentive to be pointing and making noise about how these monsters deceived us into Iraq.

There is a wonderful word, "grok", which is defined as "to understand profoundly and intuitively"; to really get something not just intellectually, but deep down in your guts. On this fifteen year anniversary our task should be to help the world deeply grok what the Iraq invasion was, what it did to humanity, how much suffering it caused and for how little justifiable reason. It's one thing to go "oh yeah that happened and a lot of people died," it is quite another to really grasp the horrors of that war on a profound visceral and intuitive level. If enough of us collaborate toward making this happen using our unprecedented access to new media, we can shake everyone's trust in the lying, warmongering empire in the way it should have been shaken fifteen years ago.

Do not let them compartmentalize away from the horrors of the Iraq invasion and what led up to it. Make the world see. Make the world remember. Make it grok it. If we can do that, we might just open up a shot at turning this thing around.


Thanks for reading! My daily articles are entirely reader-funded, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking me on Facebook, following me on Twitter, bookmarking my website, checking out my podcast, throwing some money into my hat on Patreon or Paypal, or buying my new book Woke: A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers.

Bitcoin donations:1Ac7PCQXoQoLA9Sh8fhAgiU3PHA2EX5Zm2

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Are we turning you into a Trump supporter :)

'Meanwhile, we still have seen no clear evidence that the Russian government interfered in the US elections in any meaningful way, and there's even less evidence that it penetrated the highest levels of US government as alleged in the "collusion" narrative. After well over a year of shrieking about Russia with steadily increasing shrillness, we still have the same amount of proof that we started with: zero. And yet the shrieking is getting louder and increasingly more urgent.'

The guy who's signing off on all those world-threatening escalations listed in the next paragraph? Nah.

On your support or non-support for Trump, you are both right and you are both wrong. Bottom line; we will never in the world be able to find what we need in a “leader”. The world is too big, we have outgrown them, Hoping on a leader to fix the world is like waiting for the Great Pumpkin. It’s too big and too complex. Leaders at that level are obsolete. We don’t think of flying to the stars in a coal fired rocket. Same thing
https://steemit.com/collective-intelligence/@cmw/decentralized-thought

I remember

In 1990/1991, I became accidentally embroiled in what would unfortunately become known to many as The First Gulf War. I watched as militaries poured into Saudi Arabia, and then across the border into Kuwait.

When The Second Gulf War approached, I painted my banner ”Not In My Name” and joined the barely reported hundreds-of-thousands of woken marchers in London.

It’s a con, war’s a racket, why can’t the folks not on this march see that?

News travelled differently in those days, but today, there’s no excuse for ignorance. And why, for the love of all that is good, does the No War argument require evidence, unobtainable standards of proof, when the Yes War side requires naught but a politicians whim?

We trust the media? If so, then history has clearly taught us nothing. William Randolph Hearst & Joseph Pulitzer arrived long before BBC and CNN, but by the time the Maine was sunk, a nation was prepared for war against those dastardly Spaniards. Fake news is nothing new, it’s just presented in slightly different wrappings and at far greater speeds.

Thanks again @caitlinjohnstone

I remember. I figured it would be my generation's Vietnam and Iraq's destruction. All started by a false flag that killed thousands of people, and then the media exploited it for the oligarchy's desires. Do they teach the truth in Australian schools?

Everyone has a different version of the truth. That is why the cycle continues.

I see it that there is the truth, and then there are lies that perpetuate the cycle.

Correct

Have you seen Ross Caputi's documentary about the 2nd Siege of Fallujah? Quite the eye-opener.

  ·  7 years ago (edited)

Caitlin, It is hard not to get emotional when the world is such a messed up place. Let’s work backwards though, what are the outcomes we desire? Let us list them. Then let us prioritize them. Then let us define them and consider how they may be accomplished. Your articles are valued because you say what very few do. The question I see is; how do we hand this back to the sheeple and say, you fix it. You are doing for them intellectually what they refuse to do. It is like you and I and others who consider ourselves activist in some way are earning a living and supporting hundreds of other people who don’t want to work. It is intellectual welfare on a grand scale. So how do we bring the debate to the living room of those who just “go with the flow”? Please read my blog for my ideas on how to accomplish this. Thank you again for all you do.
https://steemit.com/collective-intelligence/@cmw/save-the-world-collective-vs-individual-intelligence

I haven't forgotten, I remember all too vividly. There were many protests around the world, the Pope at that time disapproved, to an extent even Bush Sr. disapproved, and yet the Bush administration couldn't wait to get the ball rolling on that war as they rushed to begin the invasion. They weren't going to listen to anybody, and they weren't even waiting for the weapons inspector. Meanwhile the mainstream media locked ranks pushing for war, and even late night talk shows promoted the war machine.

What is interesting now is that more people are awake, while everyone seemed to be soundly under the spell back then. Unfortunately it doesn't seem that has changed very much.

It does need to stop, and it is unforgivable. But speaking of anniversaries, it was 51 years ago this May that Israel first invaded Syria, only to be thwarted by a combination of Soviet diplomacy and armament. You preach hope for new tools of communication to change public opinion, and that’s worth keeping alive. However, in addition to fingering, “every war hawk in Washington,” and, “the depravity of the US-centralized empire,” Israel needs to be called on the carpet, and our perspective on this needs to pan back much further than W’s invasion of Iraq. Furthermore, it may be time to cease playing Mother Courage, and choose sides.

You argue that, despite humanitarian pretenses, “it’s all about resources” and cite a report that Russia will be in receipt of the petrol concession should Syria stabilize. But this reductionism is insufficiently revisionist. In addition to the connection you mention with Iraq, the conflict connects with Libya, Lebanon, Syria, and Iran. It was never only going to be about Iraq. [at about the 12:00 minute mark, “Shortly after America invaded Iraq, Iraq was splintering. Syria was encouraging the resistance in Iraq, in order to scuttle America’s plans in Iraq — which included, at it’s greatest extent, Bush foresaw overturning all of the enemy regimes of the Middle East, including Syria, in order to create a Greater Middle East Reform . . . Iran was going to be toppled, Damascus toppled. And so he had really grand designs.”] When they came for Iraq, Syria did something.

Tel Aviv needs to be the entrepôt of the Middle East for it’s right to exist to gain any traction. Surrounded by enemies who refuse to accede this status to that port, she can only ever spin her wheels; hence the need to expand purchase with statelets nonsecular newly created from the carcasses of the old. Israel’s economic agenda cannot be met unless it is such an entrepôt, so when Bibi Netanyahu and the hosts of apologia state that a Libya, a Syria, an Iran or an Iraq, “threaten the existence of Israel,” they’re telling the truth; the truth from a Zionist ascendant perspective. Iraq needed to be destroyed so that Libya could be smashed. And Libya needed to be done in so Assad could be annexed (and eventually Lebanon). Syria needed to have been destroyed so that Iran would be denied the ally that might keep it afloat.

We pride ourselves on our proclivity to stand up for injustice. We say to ourselves, with Martin Niemöller, that there won’t be a repeat of the, First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out — Because I was not a Socialist. But they already came for the Iraqis, the Libyans, and to a certain extent, the Lebanese. They certainly came for the Palestinians. Will we speak out? And how?

Russia is and has been speaking out. Мы должны научиться тому, как поддерживать их усилия. Russia tried to prevent us from going into Iraq, and Russia tried to prevent us from going into Libya (as well as Lebanon). They tried to stop us all the way back in the time of LBJ. It’s high time we stop reducing the threat of war with Russia by allowing them to be seen as a potential hazard too dangerous to provoke. Maybe Russia’s been right all along? More correct, anyway?

911 predict.jpg