It had been reported today in the mainstream media that Anthony D. Weiner, a former Democratic congressman, would plead guilty, as the New York Times stated, to a "single charge of transferring obscene material to a minor."
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/19/nyregion/anthony-weiner-guilty-plea-sexting.html
But why did the United States Attorney's Office agree to a plea deal of only ONE SINGLE CHARGE??
It would appear to even the most pessimistic of Americans that this would be a slam-dunk case. There was the proverbial "smoking phone," not to mention the national wall-to-wall coverage of a seemingly fed-up wife who finally hit the road sans her miscreant husband. So it would not be amiss of us to think that even the most junior lawyer fresh out of law school could have easily won this case hands-down.
After asking "why only one charge," the first thought that immediately floats into the conscious mind is "crap, they couldn't afford to have a trial."
Who are "they"? "They" means the DeepState -- those who dwell in the dark while making life miserable for us mere mortals. And affordability is not in the literal sense of not financially being able to afford a trial funded by the U.S. taxpayers (as there seems to be enough taxpayer money to keep re-trying the Bundys over and over on the same charges until somebody somewhere finds them guilty of something, and even though the Bundys WANTED to have their day in court).
So it is very plausible that they, the Washington D.C. Elites and their masters known as the "DeepState," could not afford to have Anthony Weiner up on the stand answering question after question about his phone and his computer in any way, shape, or form.
There you go -- 1 charge.
It still remains to be seen if Weiner will be "gifted" with any prison time. Maybe Weiner having to also register as a sex offender is some consolation....or not.