The mobile device testing solution is to choose between simulators, simulators and real devices. Real equipment is a perfect combination of values and benefits, but they also have specific costs. On the other hand, simulators and simulators for mobile devices can also bring benefits and unique benefits for developers and testers, but they also have disadvantages.
Mobile application testing is an integral part of the software development life cycle. It ensures that you only release high-performance applications and protect their brand value. With the development of technology, testing has also developed with some advances and emerging mobile testing solutions.
The main types of devices for mobile application testing are: virtual devices; real devices.
The real device is the various mobile phone models that the end user will use, test app on real devices is the process of testing your Web, hybrid, and native applications on physical devices. This means that you are testing exactly how users operate their mobile devices. This allows you to run and test the functionality of the application and ensure that it runs smoothly on the customer's phone.
Real devices will have different factors, such as temperature and other software, that must be taken into account during testing to ensure better application performance. Smartphones may have a lot of interruptions, such as phone calls, battery problems, screen locking, and so on. You have to test these interrupts, and you can only do this by testing directly on a real device.
The results of real equipment tests are very accurate. However, the cost is higher because companies should purchase multiple real devices, which must be updated from time to time as new and frequent devices are released on the market.
Here are the advantages and disadvantages of real machine testing--
Benefits.
Accuracy-test app on real devices provides more accurate and reliable measurements. Testing is usually carried out in an on-site environment. This is important because network-related operations may affect the quality of your application. For example, what happens when a user receives a phone call or text message during a transaction? In this case, how is the performance of your application affected? These types of defects cannot be detected using the simulator.
Better user experience-testing on real devices will help you understand the user experience by considering memory, size, CPU, and so on.
Expose performance problems-using real equipment is more likely to expose performance defects.
Shortcoming.
High cost-as mentioned earlier, test app on real devices is more expensive. The costs involved in purchasing equipment and managing physical resources can be complex.
Slow debugging-testing on real equipment may slow down the debugging process in the early stages of software development.
Device fragmentation-multiple device types, different operating systems, and frequent software upgrades released on the market make testing on real devices more difficult.
Mobile applications are used for actual smartphones rather than simulators. You will get better quality when testing on real equipment. However, given the cost and convenience, it is not feasible to test real equipment for each application you develop.