"you keep ignoring all the infos I provided."

What infos besides the articles themselves? On voat you didn't say much beside "keep dividing us" (now who is dividing here?) "I pray for you", etc. - but you keep ignoring my particular questions, why? Besides, why do you feel personally attacked when I just want a discussion and don't agree with what you are writing?

"I don't know you"

Let me take a wild guess that you don't know most of the people you are discussing with (here, on voat or elsewhere) either. Didn't know it's mandatory to know someone to have a discussion online... But hey - you wrote articles that qualify as attempted character assassination - and now you complain that someone has the "audacity" to question your articles? Awesome. Don't play with fire if you can't take the heat.

"[...] and I don't know why you want me so badly to argue or agree [...]

I don't want you to agree, I want to discuss and I would like my questions answered. That wall of text you posted now doesn't answer them.

"I don't know why you have to defend a particular person that much who you really don't seem to know anything about …"

But you do, right? Let me take a wild guess that you didn't have any or very little pesonal contact with him and talked to your supervisor mostly. You know, I had my questions and I approached Mr. Bernard with them and he answered all my questions in a personal email to my full satisfaction. That happened soon after the first interview was released. Or in other words - I didn't form my opinion on him by hearsay only as you seem to be insinuating.

Please let me know why you seem to have made it your short-term "mission" to attack him and his bank project. You worked for him, now you don't anymore - Just carry on with your life, problem solved...? But no, now you have to publish articles - who read like a "Best of" Martin Vrijland, Nelleke Baker, "ldbroersma", and Pepijn van Erp - to shoot him down. There is almost no original research/content in your articles. What's your goal here? You don't need to support him, others don't need to support him but why do some people feel the particular need to attack him? I don't get this. Anyone who buys an EMC from the B of Joy or gets involved otherwise does that from his/her own free will. Why do some people feel the need to interfere with this decision process?

"he protects himself and others FROM CHARGES because he's a criminal if he tells the truth. The only thing he should do is reporting himself and others to authorities."

That's ludicrous and you know it. But it seems like you didn't really pay much attention to the interviews at all (or at least hope that people who read your articles didn't). Besides, you really think that those people he worked for would actually face any punishment? Lol, wake up...seriously. And why do you want him to be punished so badly? Is there a personal angle to your little campaign here?

"it seems you're American and don't know anything about the debate over here in Europe. "

Um, no. I'm German. Deswegen kannste dieses "ignoranter, unwissender Ami" Argument echt mal stecken lassen. Und ich wohne sehr viel näher an den Niederlanden als du - falls du in dem anderen Artikel die Wahrheit gesagt hast, und tatsächlich aus Berlin bist.

"The so called truther scene over here has another opinion about him. Just read the discussion under part 3 on voat."

Yeah, that discussion.... where 75% isn't even about Mr. Bernard or the B of Joy.

"another former journalist from the Netherlands worked for him as well."

Sanne Ten Hoove? I'm familiar with that story. Yeah well, he didn't actually work for him, did he? In hindsight, what he did looks more like an infiltration attempt.

"You can see the development on the page where they show who's working for them."

Yet from the people who once worked for the B of Joy only you seem to have made it a mission to try to shoot him down now. While you just could have stopped working there and carry on with your life. But you don't and I still wonder WHY?

"I just don't understand why a stranger would lock his jaws into a stranger."

You don't seem to have problems with strangers applauding you for your articles, though, do you...?