The agenda of the United States government to extradite WikiLeaks editor-in-chief Julian Assange is kind of like Israel's nuclear arsenal: everyone knows it exists, but government officials refuse to openly confirm it. US Attorney General Jeff Sessions has admitted that Assange's arrest is a priority, President Trump has said he'd support Sessions in taking that action, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has labeled WikiLeaks a "hostile non-state intelligence service," and the ranking Democrat in the US House Intelligence Committee Adam Schiff has stated that he plans on questioning Assange "when he is in US custody." But so far none have come right out and admitted that there is an extradition request for Assange or what the legal basis for it might be.
Unlike Israel's nukes, however, you'll still see empire loyalists pretending that they don't believe there's an agenda to extradite Assange. You'll often see social media accounts patrolling all posts about Julian Assange any time he's in the news, stating in remarkably uniform language that Assange is free to leave the embassy whenever he wants because there is no extradition agenda. To be clear, these people do not believe what they are saying; nobody actually believes that Assange is choosing to remain in effective solitary confinement because it's his idea of a fun time. But there are individuals with a vested interest in reinforcing the narrative that the US isn't the sort of government that would try to imprison a journalist for telling the truth.
It is this false narrative manipulation which makes it essential to document such events as ten Democratic Senators writing a letter to Vice President Mike Pence demanding that he confront Ecuadorian President Lenin Moreno about continuing to give political asylum to Assange.
Three full paragraphs of the letter (which was provided as an exclusive to a Spanish-language news publication to really shove the propaganda out into center stage) were dedicated to taking down Assange and WikiLeaks, emphasizing the unproven and plot hole-riddled claim that the GRU used WikiLeaks to release hacked information in order to influence the 2016 US presidential election. Those three paragraphs read as follows:
Despite these advances, we remain extremely concerned about Ecuador providing asylum to WikiLeaks Founder Julian Assange since June 2012. As you are aware, in its declassified January 2017 report, the U.S. Intelligence Community assessed that Russia’s Main Intelligence Directorate (GRU) used WikiLeaks to release hacked information in order to influence from the 2016 U.S. presidential election. We are also deeply troubled by WikiLeaks interventions in the 2017 French presidential election and the 2017 Spanish referendum on Catalan independence.
During his tenure as Director of Central Intelligence, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo characterized WikiLeaks as, “a non-state hostile intelligence service often abetted by state actors like Russia.” For these reasons, we were alarmed that the readout of your June 4, 2018 phone call with President Moreno made no mention of efforts by Julian Assange and WikiLeaks to interfere in the 2016 U.S. electoral process or the elections of some of our closest allies.
As the United States is still seeking clarity about the full extent of Russian intervention in our elections and Russian interference in elections across the world, it is imperative that you raise U.S. concerns with President Moreno about Ecuador’s continued support for Mr. Assange at a time when WikiLeaks continues its efforts to undermine democratic processes globally.
Why would US Senators care that Assange is receiving political asylum if his belief that the US government is trying to extradite him was a paranoid fantasy? The only known existing charge that Assange could be arrested for if he leaves the embassy is a bogus bail violation he was charged with a full 12 days after he applied for political asylum; nobody actually believes ensuring that Assange is prosecuted for that nonsensical charge is an urgent matter, let alone one so urgent it necessitates the full attention of ten sitting US Senators and the Vice President of the United States. Continuing to pretend that we don't all know that the same government which tortured Chelsea Manning is trying to extradite Assange is a farce, and the correct response to anyone denying it is to laugh in their face.
And according to a statement from a White House official, Vice President Pence marched right along to the fascistic drum beat of Democratic Senators Feinstein, Warner, Menendez, Durbin, Blumenthal, Markey, Bennet, Coons, Manchin, and Shaheen.
"The vice president raised the issue of Mr. Assange," the statement reads. "It was a constructive conversation. They agreed to remain in close coordination on potential next steps going forward."
Why would the government granting political asylum to Assange be "in close coordination" about Assange with a government that isn't interested in Assange? It's stupid to have to keep pointing this out, but the fact that political discourse about the plight of the WikiLeaks editor-in-chief is so constantly and aggressively inundated with gibberish about his not being truly detained means this needs to be pointed out. He is being detained on threat of extradition and torture. The US-centralized power establishment really is that corrupt and depraved.
The next time you run into an empire loyalist on an online forum who tries to claim that Julian Assange isn't being detained and can "leave whenever he wants", show them this article. They really don't have an argument at this point.
Any sincere thinking person already knows that Assange is most definitely being detained. And, as a UN panel has already stated unequivocally, he should be allowed to walk free of that detention and seek compensation for the wrong that has been done to him. As long as he remains held at gunpoint by the torture machine of the US-centralized empire, the US government is tacitly admitting its true nature. And all those who support it are tacitly admitting theirs.
Internet censorship is getting pretty bad, so best way to keep seeing the stuff I publish is to get on the mailing list for my website, so you’ll get an email notification for everything I publish. My articles and podcasts are entirely reader and listener-funded, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking me on Facebook, following my antics on Twitter, checking out my podcast, throwing some money into my hat on Patreon or Paypal, or buying my book Woke: A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers.
Bitcoin donations:1Ac7PCQXoQoLA9Sh8fhAgiU3PHA2EX5Zm2
Caitlin, thank you for staying on this story, Assanges's situation is untenable and I have the feeling that things might start shifting soon, and not necessarily for the best. There is a big movement in support of him, and I am wondering if, taking the cue from Pence's letter, we don't need to step things up sooner than later.
A large number of influential people have spoken and are speaking up. Petitions are going around. I am wondering if it might be a good strategy to go back to the good old-fashioned pen and paper method in addition to what is already being done.
I have this fantasy that if millions of people wrote, we could inundate each node with the physical evidence (bags and bags of mail) of support of Assange. You can delete emails. Online petitions don't take any space and one million signatures has as much effect as one thousand. Moving from virtual to real could be impressive.
The targets of this mail campaign would be as follows: the UK Prime Minister, the embassador of Ecuador in London, the president of Ecuador, Pence, Trump, the Ecuador ambassador in Washington, the Australian High Commissioner in London, the Australian Prime Minister (and whoever you think should be added to this list). What I have been thinking about is creating letter templates for each target (and in the case of Ecuador including thanks, appreciation and some subtle advance shaming if they go back on their magnanimous gesture) and making them available online pretty much ready to go.
If we could initially divvy up the task of composing the templates (not forgetting to include the relevant mailing address on each letter for ease of use) among a handful of volunteers assigned a particular target with a daily quick turnaround time, then making these templates available for reproduction, the mass movement could be somewhat of a no-brainier to implement. Print, sign, lick the stamps, mail. I'd be interested to know what you think of the idea, whether it's feasible etc. (I am willing to take a template over the weekend)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Last I heard, HRW was denied visitation to him. Is there any other update on him directly?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Do they have dirt on Moreno, or was Moreno for sale? Both? Something else?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit