RE: Wikileaks & Assange - Hero or Dis-Info Agent? (Part 2)

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Wikileaks & Assange - Hero or Dis-Info Agent? (Part 2)

in wikileaks •  8 years ago 

When you begin your argument with a detailed analysis of an obscure nickname that some 16yo kid gave himself when he was 16, it destroys your credibility from the start.

wikileaks
8 years ago by

Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:

  • Disagreement on rewards
  • Fraud or plagiarism
  • Hate speech or trolling
  • Miscategorized content or spam

Submit
$0.00
    1
    Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
    If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
    Sort Order:  
  • Trending
    • [-]
      ·  8 years ago 

    I'm not sure what my credibility has to do with it? I've presented evidence and sources.

    I am writing a series, this was part 2 - cherry-picking one point is kinda missing the whole point.

    In both of my posts I wrote:

    Some of the points that I have raised in this post are less important, or credible than others. I am merely presenting the pertinent evidence that I have discovered with you - it is up to you, the jury to arrive at a verdict.

    If one piece of evidence is not convincing - that does not mean that all of the other evidence is invalid.

    As always, do not trust anyone, (including me) - always do your own research and don’t let anyone tell you what to believe.

    I'm curious - have you read all of part 1 and part 2? Are you going to read the rest of the series?

    Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:

    • Disagreement on rewards
    • Fraud or plagiarism
    • Hate speech or trolling
    • Miscategorized content or spam

    Submit
    $0.02
    • Past Payouts $0.02
    • - Author $0.02
    • - Curators $0.01
    1 vote