Anyx, Cheetah, and Steemcleaners; witness update - 06-12-2016

in witness-category •  8 years ago  (edited)
Steemfest!Supercomputing Conference!

    Phew, conferences! If for some reason you didn't hear about it, SteemFest, hosted in Amsterdam, was a few weeks ago. What an amazing time! It was incredible to put faces to usernames, and meet a lot of the people I've been interacting with online for so long. After SteemFest, I traveled straight to another conference, Supercomputing, in Salt Lake City. There I presented a recent publication of mine, which was fun too.. but not nearly as good as SteemFest! :)

Anyways, I figured I'd do a full update today, since it's been a while. Happy hardfork day~


1. Accomplished the past few weeks:

  1. Since I wasn't around much during the conferences, I followed @smooth's SBD interest rate and discount monetary policies directly.
  2. Participated as a @steemcleaners member as often as I could to help fight fraud and abuse on the platform.
  3. Upgraded flawlessly to HardFork 16, which went live today.
    • Witness upgraded without missing any blocks!
    • @cheetah and @seraph bots both upgraded fine, as well as my voting bot, and price feed.
  4. Added the first bit of functionality of @cheetah to Golos, the blacklist, for spammers and serial abusers. I have given control of her to @aleksandraz there, who is heading the steemcleaners parallel initiative, kulturagolosa, on their network.

2. Upcoming projects/goals:

  1. I will need to figure out how to restructure @steemcleaners, which I will discuss more below.
  2. I plan to port @cheetah's content detection over to Golos, next. Hopefully I will also be able to sync the two in a way to easily check for cross-platform plagiarism as well.

3. Thoughts from the past few weeks:

    Hard fork 16 is now live! This is a huge change to the steem inflation strategy, as well as rewards. What this also means that going forward, is that "witness funding for projects" has essentially been cut, unless the price of steem rises dramatically. Overall, I think the economic changes are good; however, without any new method to fund projects, I fear the abandonment of previous witness projects/support.

    What this means for @steemcleaners: It is unclear to me how long we will be able to offer rewards. Without "witness project" support, we have about one more month at most, at which point and time the project will simply become voluntary only. Lately, our manpower has been dwindling -- we have not even had time to compile and post weekly logs. Payouts are still being issued though, for now. If the price of steem drops further, @cheetah may also have to be abandoned (or otherwise need to be monetized/run by donation to keep her alive). I have often considered removing features of @cheetah due to community backlash, so they might end up getting their wish soon enough!

    Lastly, a month ago I made a comment about the 'vote betting/monetization', as follows:

I would be much more interested to see these events and games be implemented as smart contracts on the steem blockchain, with the removal of the high reward going into the 'trusted' account, and the outcome being programically guaranteed rather than based on trust of the user. It would be an interesting setup, to code games people can play on the network.

    As it turns out, @dan is starting to think about this (see this post here), so I hope that such as system does get built into the chain. More importantly in my mind however, is the separation of content to be easily accessible; 'link sharing' should only be for curation rewards and not author rewards, and in a separate interface, 'blogging' should be in a separate interface, and 'games' should also. Will this happen? Who knows, but it's something I'd certainly like to see.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Thanks for the update @anyx. Happy Hardfork Day to you too. LOL
I actually love @cheetah and would hate to see it go. I really believe it is an important bot. Perhaps there could be a way to easily whitelist usernames for a specific period of time before she starts spot checks again. You know, kind of a way to "re-register". For instance, if you set cheetah to whitelist luzcypher's openmic nights for 4 months or something. Then cheetah does a little prowl to make sure everything is good and back on the whitelist again. Just an idea.

Thanks for the feedback! Whitelisting (or even banning) for a period of time is a feature I wanted to implement but haven't had the time.. another thing for the TODO list! :p

Usually, when people come to me with a valid reason and ask politely, I will whitelist them. However, I prefer it when people making "series" posts do so on separate accounts (e.g. @steemsports), because it's then very clear what the account is for (and only for). I have no problem whitelisting accounts like that.

Agree. She annoyed me at first, but has become a very valuable member of Steemit, IMO.

Great idea about separation of content and disabling author rewards for "link sharing"!

Link sharing for curation rewards only is an interesting proposal.

Hi, good job, keep going :)

Very Nice on the update. I'm sad to hear about the status on @steemcleaners. It was really nice to have something keep us in "check." I'm sure you'll figure something out.

I personally like the @cheeta bot. I can't imagine how many spammy posts there would be without it. I know some resent it. I appreciate the work you do. Thank you

Can I ask that you, as I would like to see witnesses in general do, briefly describe where you stand socially and politically on a few issues of your own choice.

In my opinion, this gives a better understanding of the more personal motivations that could be driving a witness at some point in time.