The way I understood Voice, it seemed different from Steemit, but if Voice is attempting to compet with Steemit and destroy it, of course I’m interested. I see no reason to be ”loyal” to Steemit. A reason can be given, but I don’t see one on the horizon rn.
RE: Remove your witness vote from @lukestokes.mhth and get some free SHIT!
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Remove your witness vote from @lukestokes.mhth and get some free SHIT!
Anything associated with "EOS" has satanic undertones, mostly in the symbolism. I'm unsure about the future of Steem but in my opinion, EOS is not an alternative.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The main issues are that Voice is not anonymous, relies on centralisation instead of decentralisation and has a totally different reward approach that may or may not be an improvement. It's a much more mainstream project due to it's higher funding.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
There’s nothing wrong with centralisation. If nothing else, Steemit is great evidence as to why decentralisation is terrible.
Nothing works here. And everything is a mess.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
There are benefits to both centralisation and decentralisation. The former can produce a greater focus sometimes, at the cost of freedom and the latter allows greater autonomy and potential for balance. I'd rather choose freedom.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Freedom is seriously overrated. And I say this as a former libertarian, so I do know the gospel by heart.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Freedom cannot be overrated. What do you choose now? I am unclear.. I tend to think of bootlicking as being the alternative.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
My dog would be less happy in the wild since it probably couldn’t survive very well.
Living under my roof, he geta food, water, love, and care, and seems pretty happy.
But he is the opposite of free.
I’d rather live happily under a fascist state, for instance, than starve on the streets in anarchy.
This fetish people have for freedom is idiotic. Freedom is for the ultra rich. And yea, if you’re ultra rich, freedom is great.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Inability of dogs to survive away from humans due to domestication is not an argument against freedom. Had he have not been born into the unfortunate result of a loss of freedom, he might be a proud member of a large family of wild dogs. Freedom is not the problem, rather it is the forces that seek to prevent freedom that cause the problems and the loss of power that results in an inability to thrive.
If you take a default position that anarchy will result in your starvation then obviously you will be against it, but that is a strawman if ever I saw one. True anarchy just means no rulers and I have no examples of me needing rulers in order for me to eat. Typically rulers don't do much to help me eat at all. Seeds, the soil, the elements, spirit and my free will are all I need in that regard.
If you associated freedom with being rich then you are only demonstrating how unfree we are using money/capitalism and are not making a case against freedom.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Lack of freedom means people can be taxed in order to provide the food to those who currently can not provide it themselves.
And you talk about seeds and soil... Dude, if eating berries in a fucking forest is what it means to be free, I’m happy living under a civilized state lol.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit