Creating "Evergreen" Content in an Instant Gratification World

in writing •  8 years ago 

If you are a regular writer and creator of content on the Web, it seems likely you have pondered the question "How will I get the most out of my writing?" 

It makes sense-- few of us like to work hard, only to get little or no response, be that financial, or page views or feedback or comments.

What IS "Quality" in this World of 140-character tweets?

AppleBlossom
Apple blossom in our garden

These days, much gets written and said about the importance of "quality content." 

And yet? The web primarily seems to accommodate short soundbites, tweets and vacuous memes. Seems rather contradictory, to me.

Still... the major search engines-- led by Google-- are increasingly focusing their algorithms on creating what they call a "positive experience" for web users; the focus on quality (rather than quantity or "SEO smoke and mirrors") has become very important for those who write online.

It still seems quite odd to me that so much effort gets put into so-called clickbait and fake news, rather than creating something of value... and that's what always brings me back to the "instant gratification world" we seem to live in.

Evergreen Content-- the Conventional Perspective

For me, an important aspect of quality content-- especially the kind that will keep generating traffic to your blog or web site over a long period of time-- is to keep it "evergreen."

Poppies
A wealth of Poppies in bloom

Most of us know what "evergreen" means in the context of trees and plants, but what does it mean, in terms of web content?

The basic idea is to create something that is pretty much always useful, and always current. 

"News" items may get a lot of initial attention when they are first posted, but they quickly grow stale. Think about it: Who's going to read about a "current" event that happened several months ago? Similarly, some kinds of articles are very seasonal; they may (because of their focus) do well around Christmas or Easter or "summer" but otherwise "go to sleep" because they are not related to what the world is looking at, right now. 

In the broadest sense, good examples of "evergreen" content would be advice columns, psychology and science, "how to" tutorials, movie reviews, Philosophy, most finance and economics, personal essays and travel accounts and such.

Steemit is an Interesting "Hybrid"

A number of people have commented that Google really seems to "like" Steemit-- many posts here rank very highly in search results.

WhiteLilacs
White lilacs... yes, it's a thing

Aside from the fact that the site is advertising free-- yay for that!-- as a "collection," the content on Steemit tends to be of generally very good quality. There is actually a lot of "evergreen" content here.

The things that's slightly odd about "writing for the long term" here on Steemit is that the "shelf life" of most posts-- at least from a rewards perspective-- is just seven days, which is pretty much the opposite of evergreen. 

The fact that so much good stuff is still created here suggests to me that a lot of contributors really care about both the overall community's well-being and representing themselves well. That makes sense to me, too... even if I'm only going to be rewarded for what these words do for the next seven days... I know they are going to be "out there" for as long as the Steemit blockchain exists... and I'm going to be "attached" to that.

So quality and doing our best does matter!

How about YOU? What kind of content and articles do you prefer to create? Do you have a niche (or several) you pursue, or are you more of a "whatever comes into my head" contributor? Do you consider that your work is going to be on the Steemit blockchain pretty much forever, before putting it out there? Please leave comment-- share your experiences-- start the conversation!

(As per usual, all text and images by the author, unless otherwise mentioned. This is original content, created expressly for Steemit)

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

I post my art and try to write something of interest to go along with it. The artworks themselves are permanent - or "evergreen" - and creating them has been my life's passion. I used to post to Facebook and Twitter, but finally concluded they weren't worth the effort so deleted both accounts. Steemit is a different story: I believe intelligent people are viewing my work and appreciating it here. The fact that the posts are on a blockchain also appeals to me.

@chessmonster, I like that approach very much; writing "matters" to me and has been my calling since I was a little kid... and I am increasingly moving towards making Steemit my "operations hub" for everything I do with writing online... I really do like the "permanence factor" of the blockchain; it reminds me a bit of submitting posts to the "Wayback Machine," only it's far more convenient, and automatic.

Also hoping to add more art related posts here, as time goes by.

I look forward to your art posts!

Generally, I agree that if I'm going to put my name on something, I'd like it to be of great quality (or at least, my best). However, the short shelf life on Steemit has led me to question whether long-form articles are the best approach. I wonder if it makes more sense to write high quality, but shorter pieces? (Although in all fairness, it often takes just as long to write quality short pieces as it does to write long ones.) Anyway, with a bit of trial and error, I'm sure we'll all find the sweet spot between what we have to offer Steemit and what best serves the community's needs.

Well, I guess what matters to me is that "it has my name on it," so if someone Googles something that leads to one of my articles two years from now, I would like it to "reflect well," even if I don't stand to gain anything more than... perhaps... that person checking out my profile or one of my web sites and following my current work.

So I see it as also benefiting the Steemit community, in the longer run.

  ·  8 years ago (edited)

Firstly, screw you as as there goes a post I have been working a couple hours on.

Secondly, good post and I agree when it comes to the instant gratification clan of the world. It has been a long and arduous brainwashing to achieve it so don't mess it up for all if the governments and organisations that worked hard for it. Of course, the clan think they are awake and will feel it is out of efficiency and freewill.

For me, I am lucky to get a couple people reading and commenting. Without being too biased, I don't think the general quality is that low but not many people seem to read what may be valuable over a lifetime. They want quick results that taste good. Not what I offer in shop perhaps.

I don't know what the solution is for me personally but there is always the beckoning to join the clan and take short gains.

Desperation is shortsighted and I think that in the many desperate attempts at fulfilling a growing list of desires, the big picture has been lost to most.

I may not be the best at it, but I am trying to help find it. To do so, I cross many genre boundaries and even attach thoughts to my photo posts. Honestly, there is not enough feedback to give a good indication of how they are received. If it is eyeballs on, not well. If it is reward, not great but this platform keeps saying it is content based and if all the content is shortgame, who will stay for the longrun? It becomes just another news and gossip site filled with reposts of other's work, youtube videos, news stories and images of meals. The market differentiation is left to the blockchain. Easy enough to replicate by a large organisation with a massive user base already.

Quality content is much harder to replicate. Especially, as the creator pool dwindles down.

Great minds, yadda, yadda...

I guess part of the "acid test" for me is to consider whether some random person might find a measure of value in what I put out there... next month, next year, or whatever. If I can't see a reasonable purpose for the writing to exist-- beyond my temporary amusement in this minute-- then it probably doesn't get written...

I am going forward on the assumption that "quality matters" here on Steemit, but I am also aware that there will be all sorts of things here. Whereas the rewards are nice, I'm not going to sacrifice my fundamental approach to make a few more dollars.

This is a good approach to have I think even if the quality gets lost in the system perhaps it gets found again and helps someone in the future.
There definitely is going to be a growing quality divide moving forward as more join. It is only natural I guess. Well, socially engineered, but you know what I mean.

We can but wait and see.

I am feeling mildly hopeful that when the hordes of "general money-for-nothing seekers" make their entry, the community will take the time and effort to flag/downvote plagiarism, copy paste comments and comment spam to keep them from having a rewarding experience here.

That's a new term for me, but I like it. I tend not to think so much of the longevity my content will have. I mostly focus on writing about topics that interest me.

Which is a perfectly reasonable approach... and pretty similar to what I tend to do. I just make sure I feel good about what I am putting out there, since the Steemit blockchain is likely to be around for a while.

I do the same. And I have also chosen topics that I feel I can write about for a long time to come and that people seem to have interest.