Teaching: What the heck is Theory of Knowledge?

in writing •  7 years ago  (edited)
Teaching is a proper challenge, it’s an incredibly complex labour that tests you and gives you a variety of tools to confront different kinds of problems. For a long time I’ve dealt with a bit of insecurity about my teaching capacities (I say “a long time” but I’ve only been working in this field for almost five years hah).


I face that shred of doubt daily. This is why I always ask myself new ways that I can make use of my abilities to efficiently communicate my ideas/knowledge, and present my students with a broad range of perspectives that allow them to develop their own critical capacities and, hopefully, see the world from another point of view.

Theory of Knowledge presents me with the perfect opportunities to do so.


Source:
Warning: I know it’s long, but it’s also interesting!


First of, I must clarify that defining Theory of knowledge in just a few words is… complicated, to say the least. To write this post represents a challenge on its own, but I’ll try to explain myself as best as I can. Please forgive any simplification that I incur on, but I must follow the generalisation path if I want to move on with the post.
On one hand “Theory of Knowledge” refers to a philosophical discipline, on the other hand, it comprises a core subject of the Diploma Programme of the International Baccalaureate.
The first of those two (that I’ll only refer to superficially) it’s also known as “Epistemology”, although many authors would not agree that they are the same thing. The word Epistemology comes from the greek ἐπιστήμη "knowledge"or “wisdom” and λόγος "logical discourse". In simple words, it means a philosophical study of the nature of knowledge.


On the text in spanish: as you can see, Logos also means “word”. Source: Vox Dictionary.
The source of this image is my own dictionary (sorry, I only own a greek-spanish!)

The second meaning of the term (the one we’re interested in for the sake of the post), as I said, refers to a very special subject that belongs to a very special curriculum: the Diploma Programme of the International Baccalaureate. Said programme was created in 1968 and since then taughts pupils between the ages of 16 and 19, it's being implemented in over 4,500 schools around the globe.

If you want to know more about the Diploma Programme and the International Baccalaureate [click here](http://www.ibo.org/)

Theory of Knowledge is a course that aims to the reflection about the nature of knowledge

This means that the general goal of this subject focuses on the examination, analysis, explanation and interpretation of the ways in which we know. The pupils must ask themselves a series of questions that invites them to inquire about human knowledge. These questions are called knowledge questions: “How is knowledge possible?”, “on which grounds?”, “under which assumptions lies a knowledge?”, “how can we establish what it means to have a ‘valid’ knowledge?”, “in which contexts?”... But the most important of them all: How do I/we know”.

It seems pretty simple, doesn’t it?

Well, it isn’t.


Most of the time we take knowledge for granted, we think knowledge is a type of mechanical process that just happens, we don’t ask ourselves about how it happens. We assume that we know instead of thinking we know. And believe me, there is a fair amount of things we think we know, we just don’t know it yet ;) (seewhatIdidthere)


Source: Jon Tyson in Unsplash


Unlike most academic subjects, that aim to the learning of a group of specific knowledge, “Theory of Knowledge” is a course dedicated to critical thinking and inquiring into the process of knowing. That’s why is question based.


The first thing I ask my students is: "What do you know? Tell me something you know". At first they giggle because they find that question so obvious!, but some of them actually find it hard to pick amongst all the things they know (or think they know). Sometimes I lead with an example and say: "I know my name. That’s something I know. Does everyone here knows their name?" They all giggle and nod. Then I ask them what is a name, how do we know our name, what makes us claim that one is our name and not another, where does the knowledge of our names come from, how do we access it, etc.

The knowledge of our own name comes to us, initially, through repetition: our parents teach us to establish a connection (first it’s a physical one, then a conceptual one) between ourselves and the word: in the same way we learn to name the rest of the things of the world. Then we accept that word, that name, as something that defines us and identifies us. “The name” is our first step into the conformation of identity, and that is a type of knowledge. A personal knowledge.
The first distinction we make at TOK (let’s call it that from now on) is between “personal knowledge” and “shared knowledge”.


Personal knowledge encloses all of those abilities, skills, capacities (or even feelings, ideas, opinions) that we’ve acquired from our own individual subjective experiences, routines, any type of training or even formal education, and that we find so difficult to effectively communicate to others.

Shared knowledge, on the other hand, refers to a pile of knowledge that are obtained, interexchanged and connected to more than one individual (communities, families, groups, etc.) and serves as foundation to the structuring of a shared experience of the world.

Some of our personal experiences are, to a large extent, shared. And a great deal of our shared knowledge makes the growth of our personal knowledge possible.


I made this image using this app
go check it out!


Knowledge comes from somewhere, and that is why the TOK syllabus identifies 8 ways in which we humans obtain knowledge. These are the “Ways of Knowing” :

I made this image using this app
go check it out!


These sources of knowledge usually work simultaneously. For example: it is not possible to know something with our senses if we can’t remember what they helped us perceive; sense perception and memory work together. It is the TOK pupil’s (we also call them knowers)) responsability to ask themselves in what way do WoK (Ways of Knowing) operate both individually and jointly to help us obtain knowledge.


WoK's constitute a starting point to the conformation of personal knowledge, but they also allow us to organise and systematise it in Areas of Knowledge. TOK identifies 8 of them:


Vision and Strategy.jpg
I made this image using this app
go check it out!


Each area has particular and diverse objectives, limitations, motivations, importance, implementations, methods, and historical developments and, as you might have noticed, they make up for a type of shared knowledge. So, in order for Maths or Sciences to be able to call themselves “areas of knowledge”, they must establish from which perspectives they will organise and systematise the knowledge they produce.


Now that we’re at it, one of the key concepts to understand the way in which human beings relate to and because of knowledge is the idea of perspective. Perspective allows us to relate to “the other”, it’s what helps us shape an idea of the world, and it’s higly influenced by all of our shared and personal knowledge. This concept is essential to the TOK analysis.

The TOK course encourages the pupils to embrace their role as “knowers” so they can be able to examine their own perspectives, assumptions, knowledge claims and behaviours from different points of view. In this way they can expand on their critical, creative and inquiring abilities, and they can learn to face the world in a more honest and reflective way, with open mindedness.

The conscious “knower” is aware that knowledge is power and that, to quote good ol’ Ben Parker:

"With great power comes great responsibility."


Image: Joey Nicotra in Unsplash


I hope you found this reading somewhat interesting ;) Check out my future posts!
Edit: I forgot to add the diagrams in english! there you have them now

Alicia.




Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Me encantó tu post, está genial! Ori se alegró de verte. Estás en discord? búscame por ahí para estar al tanto. Saludos

¡Qué fino que lo hayas leído! Saludos a Ori. No estoy en Discord, la verdad aún soy muy nueva por aquí y todavía ando finding my way around jajaja

i was really waiting for this because i was curious if it s someting interesting and thank you. Hope you will continue and make a serie out of it . And can you put the picture in english please ...

I appreciate your interest! I am planning of writing more about knowledge itself, but it wont necessarily be about TOK. I already edited the images :)

Thank you :)

This post is so interesting! I found really interesting information here and I've learned about Theory of Knowledge :) Thank you for sharing a little bit of your knowledge!

WARNING - The message you received from @boyhaque is a CONFIRMED SCAM!
DO NOT FOLLOW any instruction and DO NOT CLICK on any link in the comment!
For more information, read this post: https://steemit.com/steemit/@arcange/phishing-site-reported-steemautobot-dot-ml
Please consider to upvote this warning if you find my work to protect you and the platform valuable. Your support is welcome!