Knowledge is Humbling

in writing •  7 years ago 

I am currently working on my PhD-Thesis. Going through all the literature, all the tidbits of knowledge that others have found and compiled is a humbling experience. This is driven home by the fact that I am working only in one field of knowledge. One of many.

Graph: How much you think you know and how much you actually know diverges.
How much you think you know and how much you actually know diverges.
(I saw a graph like this a long time ago on the Internet; Sadly I don't know the original creator of it, but it rang true ever since then.)

At one point you realize that you couldn't do any of this alone. That science is a team sport. You can only get further by working with others, not by doing everything by yourself.
It is pure hubris to think you know everything. That there isn't anything new to discover. It is also foolish to think that we are the pinnacle of creation. Or the pinnacle of evolution.
If there is a god, or a goddess. If we are eternal souls ... then the only thing I can believe, is that we came here to be humbled.
The universe is far greater than we can imagine, and the knowledge we have and can still accumulate is even unimaginable.
We have been given wonderful gifts, by something greater than us, or by an evolutionary process. Instead of being humbled by it all, instead of being grateful, instead of sharing, many feel entitlement. Entitlement not only toward nature, but even toward our peers ...
I know this, because I feel this as well. I fear that others would exploit me, and therefore I am less charitable than I could be.
We exploit others, and they, in turn exploit others, still. It is a chain of exploitation, and if one stops, another steps up. Many also keep on exploiting, lest they fall to the lower steps of the ladder.
There is one thing many on the top don't realize though: If the one on the bottom, the one that supports us all, perishes, then everyone else on the chain will perish as well. If the one on the top perishes, there won't be a problem. If nature dies, humanity will fall with it. If all humans were to vanish, nature will continue on.
If the working people perish, the rich won't be able to do anything, if the rich were to vanish, the working people would still be able to sustain themselves.
Strangely enough, it seem that the graph above also works for how much people know, and how much entitlement they feel.

Graph: Entitlement vs. Knowledge
Knowledge is humbling.

And yet I see people brag how much they know. Would they really know that much, then they wouldn't show as much hubris. They would feel less entitlement, and realize that survival can be played as a team game as well.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Good post. I like the comments on the hubris of educated people, very fitting. But I am curious, what's the horizontal axis of your graphs? You mentioned science in your text, I'm sure you understand that a graph without some definition is at most a 'doodle'.

I left the x-axis out intentionally, as I can only relate the two points on the two graphs against each other. The y-axis is and can't be defined in this case.
And yes, it is some kind of doodle, the y-axis would be the amount of "knowledge" (hard/or believed) on the one, and the other should probably have two y-axes ...

In the end, a doodle can still help to visualize a point you want to make ;-)

So I can take from your second graph that less knowledgeable people feel more entitled? And I am curious, what was going to be on the horizontal axis that you intentionally left out? Forgive me if this feels like an attack, it's really not, I'm just curious. I found this post going through my feed tonight, at some point you must have made a comment I found interesting enough to follow you.

Well, I have no evidence for the second graph, but it certainly feels like it. Especially when looking at certain people that make policies ... although, after sleeping, it is a gross oversimplification.
And the horizontal axis ... I still can't put one there. It is not time (although it could be, in certain cases). Still, I made the graph initially leaving that axis out, because I never intended to put one there.

Good answer. For me, I would put age on that horizontal axis for the first graph. When I was young I thought I knew a lot more than I did and got wiser with age. Not in all cases, but in some cases it would work for the second graph as well.

i know nothing