Bid bots can easily end their impact on the rest of us.

in yourideassuck •  6 years ago 

I think the consensus is that bid bots are bad for steem.
We knew that 3 years ago, but we are on stinc dev time, I guess.

sulu1.jpg

By declining rewards bid bots end their impact on those of us that don't pay to play.

The posts still trend.
Visibility is still given for buying bot votes.

But,

Instead of taking from the pockets of everybody, only those buying votes will pay.

useless eaters.jpg

Steem is a commons.
The more you cheer on the already wealthy while they suck up as much as they can, you are cutting your own throat.
When a whale votes that value comes from all the other votes.
It makes your vote smaller.
Yea, whales!

I've suggested this in the past, in two different discords.
They booted me.
yourideassuck5a419c.jpg

I have a suspicion that one of the ninja changes in a past fork made declined rewards posts not trend, but I haven't had that confirmed, yet.
It wouldn't be the first time something I pointed

If you know anything about that, dear reader, please contact here or on discord, eh?

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  
  ·  6 years ago (edited)

I don't think they are bad. I think the mirror a real business case

There are two problems. They don't help clean up their mess and there are too many of them.

Imagine if it always COST money to gain visibility. So we would get the buy pressure of people wanting to gain visibility and still have ways to be seen.

Imagine if they gave one round a day to a curation team.

Imagine if they gave some of their profits to a flag team.

I don't dislike the bidbots, and I am glad we have some. However, it is lazy money for most of them and they aren't cleaning up their messes.

:)

I always enjoy your point of view.

I just want pob to come back.
I would like for each subsequent vote to count for more than if it was alone.
We had that for ~8 great days.
You were here.
We knew at the time that this would be the end result of linear rewards.
Doldrums for the price, and graveyards for the newbs.

Second this.
Too much water under the bridge to change back now; too many businesses built. Too much momentum.
I'm still convinced it was a mistake to ditch n2.

It's time to set right what was intentionally broken, imo.
It was said that we would try linear for a while, we can always go back, but that was just one more lie from a (now) known liar.
We are still in beta, we should try other things if what we have isn't working.