This is the miniseries that exists because of support from Steemians!
This is part 5, about implicit premises in arguments
- Part 1 is available here: https://steemit.com/blog/@davidpakman/ccxxnydh
- Part 2 is available here: https://steemit.com/blog/@davidpakman/bhqbdz74
- Part 3 is available here: https://steemit.com/blog/@davidpakman/zedqsq2u
- Part 4 is available here: https://steemit.com/blog/@davidpakman/56o28681
- Part 5 is available here: https://steemit.com/blog/@davidpakman/lx9a8r1a
If you have suggestions for future miniseries, let me know in a reply!
▶️ DTube
▶️ IPFS
Implicit premises cause me many problems when trying to analyze arguments, especially those that I accept but may not be true. They can be abused to trick people into accepting bad ideas.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit