I don't want to argue and drag this out, I've already said what I thought and pointed out some pretty clear facts (not accusations).
simply not true and CAN be indefinately proved
Anyone that's been paying attention for the last decade knows that ad networks are a major infection vector. You can't "indefinately prove" anything, you refuse to even positively identify WHAT code you claim is safe (by not providing a unique file hash).
I'm really surprised nobody else had pointed any of this out to you before tbh, this makes me doubt the validity of your "25k+ customers" claim if this is how you react .
Years of scams and malware specifically targeted to noob crypto users makes me extremely suspicious of this type of software, and I still think my comments were valid.
You're asking people to disregard basic security practices / opsec for a max reward of A FEW CENTS versus a max risk of EVERYTHING they have on their machine (ie: wallet, identity, this varies by person).
I'm sorry you're so offended by me pointing out facts, but at no point did you "verbally" (or textually) attack you, I simply wrote a list of problems I see with your approach to software distribution in the nicest way I could think of.
I'm just blunt - that doesn't make it an attack and I really (still) don't have any issue with you at all.
Not going to keep responding about this, I think anyone that reads my comments with a clear head can see what I'm saying and why..