RE: My Views on Intellectual Property

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

My Views on Intellectual Property

in copyright •  8 years ago  (edited)

You don't understand, I wasn't referring to people's immediate allies.

I was saying that people could care about others, just on a different degree.

I am disagreein with you on the fact that "care" must always be strong.

I am saying "care" is relative. Like if you buy a house for your kid, that is big care. If you invent a technology that can help save a 3rld world child's life, that is also "care", just on a different level, more indirect, but still it's care.

You don't need to know people directly to have care for them.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

yeah..I don't understand.
I DO have to know someone..up close and personal...to care about them.
one death is a tragedy..a million deaths are a statistic.

Maybe you feel that way, but that is perhaps your own philosophy, but others might not feel that way.

An inventor doesn't invents things just to make money, if making money were his goal, he would have been a banker or an investor.

An inventor might have secondary goals, like the wellbeing for his community. He doesn't have to know everyone to care for them, in fact if he would know most people, he would realize that he might hate a lot of them.

So in some sense Maslow's self-actualization phenomena, is in fact a way how people are helping others.

Collectivism is a very complex system, and it all boils down to the individual. The individual is the core of society.