RE: @NED'S REACTION TO @DAN'S LATEST POST

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

@NED'S REACTION TO @DAN'S LATEST POST

in dmania •  7 years ago 

Aggrandisement is about increasing power, status or wealth - denied payout or not - it was promotional and therefore self-aggrandisement. Gotta side with @Ned on this one.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Aggrandisement is about increasing power, status or wealth

So...what would you call the fact that Ned felt the need to upvote his 3 word comment to almost $3k?

I doubt it was for the money - it was probably so nobody could dethrone his comment. Promotion is obviously the whole point of the platform. He must have thought the EOS promotion was important enough to address - but he is showing the inherit weaknesses in the Steemit ecosystem. Zeus shouldn't come down from Mount Olympus to interefere unless there is a REALLY good reason. There is no censorship on Steemit IF you have enough SP - otherwise - self aggrandise with care ;)

so nobody could dethrone his comment

Right there, that's self-aggrandizement.

  ·  7 years ago (edited)

That's not self-aggrandisement- he is the official voice of this platform - Dan gave that up a long time ago. Didn't he use the company SP as well? He obviously felt the posts were negatively affecting the user experience - I don't think it had to do with an increase of power or status on Ned's part. These guys obviously aren't sending each other Christmas cards - I'm sure @ned will probably power up whatever his comment gets paid.

Wow

It's right..

Lol Ned....