Exactly.

Purchasing a domain on March 11th for a hardfork project which has actually has been planned or discussed for years (just not in this shape of course) is actually extremely, extremely late. Especially given the horrible situation since February. It could have been purchased in February, or early march, and that would be more inline with the dramatic problems happening.

Also people tried to get in touch with JS before putting in action the soft fork to freeze the funds.

Having a domain or an idea/solution in mind in case diplomacy fails is also not being a liar...

This argument about a domain purchased on March 11th is entirely misleading and empty. I am very disappointed by seeing such things being raised. It's as if people don't care about truth or have no real experience in IT and just throw random tomatoes because they can. To me, this is some kind of low morality.

There are a few things to put as counterarguments, but not this one I think.