Plus, when @proxy.token tried to settle between JS and 22.2 witnesses to prevent from a chain split (the meeting was held on March 11), they were purchasing the Hive.blog domain (purchased on March 11) - so their "gesture" to talk with JS and KR was merely a strategy to earn more time to do all this thing. What a smart sneaky people!
I've spent $10 on a domain 100's of times in my life that I never built out. One actor buying one domain doesn't mean a consensus has been made.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Exactly.
Purchasing a domain on March 11th for a hardfork project which has actually has been planned or discussed for years (just not in this shape of course) is actually extremely, extremely late. Especially given the horrible situation since February. It could have been purchased in February, or early march, and that would be more inline with the dramatic problems happening.
Also people tried to get in touch with JS before putting in action the soft fork to freeze the funds.
Having a domain or an idea/solution in mind in case diplomacy fails is also not being a liar...
This argument about a domain purchased on March 11th is entirely misleading and empty. I am very disappointed by seeing such things being raised. It's as if people don't care about truth or have no real experience in IT and just throw random tomatoes because they can. To me, this is some kind of low morality.
There are a few things to put as counterarguments, but not this one I think.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Agreed.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit