Responding to EOS Alliance Launches with the Mandate to “Empower EOS For All”

I'll admit I need to look into the Alliance a little bit more, but just glancing at it, I don't trust or think this is a good initiative for EOS at all. Just a few red flags:

🚩 BROCK PIERCE!
There's a reason Block.ONE kicked him out. EOS doesn't need an (alleged) child predator as a possible face for EOS.

🚩 Lack of Ideological Diversity
I know I've shit talked BPs that are also exchanges, but we need at least one to maintain ideological diverse representation and we don't unintentionally disadvantage people.

🚩Constitutional Violations
This honestly sounds like a violation of the EOS Constitution and each of the BPs on the list, if true, ought to be remembered for their efforts.

🚩CHANGING THE CONSTITUTION
If violating the constitution isn't true, they are attempting to change the constitution! They directly say they intend to brainstorm changes for the constitution.

Anyways, here's the list of BPs that have pledged allegiance to EOS Alliance. I'm personally removing my votes from them until there is a little more clarification on this new organization that sounds like an Anti-Block.ONE. I believe this may pose potential threat the Alliance has on encouraging Dan to yet again leave a project that has turned towards greed and bringing his following with him? I can't help but notice that Cypherglass isn't on the list of BPs in Ali; I have no doubt Brock Pierce is good at promoting a project, but there's a reason B1 booted him: he's got a lot of baggage that rightfully should concern EOS holders enough to support candidates that A. are compliant to the EOS constitution B. Develops tools to evaluate BPs infrastructure and compliance with the Constitution, and finally C. Aren't discussing redrafting the Constitution?