Interesting thoughts! I must admit. However, I found that in trying to understand Tesla's work reading theories by other people (including Dollard) has never helped me. On the contrary they are more likely to confuse and send you off on a different path. I want to stick with Tesla's work until I understand it in all its details because I think it is fairly complete and covers much more than just simple electrical effects.
RE: The discovery of Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter - part 9 (end)
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
The discovery of Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter - part 9 (end)
Yes! It is your diligence to the primary sources is to why I keep bugging you. Im just glad to be able to run the occasional thought by you for clarity.
At the end of your 'Magnifying Transmitter - part 3' article, you spend some time identifying quotes / thought experiments on the physical description of the medium / molecule / ether. I am going to go back and more scrupulously study the details here, for I know I don't have a complete understanding here, but I do know that this area is of huge significance.
Some interesting things im hanging on to;
-Measuring / illustrating /isolating the difference between the incompressible Medium #1 and the particulate substantive Medium #2.
-The measuring of this particulate Medium #2? 2.09374·10-26 g/ml. I would love to know the details of this experiment, because I think Im confused on what it is he is measuring... The vacuum?
-& The presence of Longitudinal up to 1MHz (suggesting that the air / medium is saturating?)
I am hoping that you will shed more light onto these subjects due to its prime importance with all that is here... especially for the sake of illustrations :D
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
In the lectures Tesla gave from 1891-1893 he explains in quite some detail the experiments he did that led him to believe that there is this second medium. As for the density, I don't know how he determined it, he only supplies the outcome. And finally the changing from longitudinal to transverse is a thought that Tesla played with (he mentions it in the above mentioned lectures). Normally a gas will only pass longitudinal waves and a solid only transverse. But who is to say that this remains the same over the entire frequency range. It makes sense to assume that at a certain point the gas molecules can no longer keep up and the gas starts to behave like a solid allowing only for transverse waves.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Excellent! Thanks for the pointers. Im now re-reading those lectures with now closer attention. Trying hard to not skip any lines this time :) & redrawing the described experiments as I go.
As for thinking about the Bremsstrahlung, I had an interesting thought experiment for visualizing the breaking radiation surrounding an object that is being bombarded. Hopefully in attempts of leaving the electron bullet and marble visualizations for something more fluidic / pressure /polarized in relation.
I was goofing around with this simulator:
http://www.falstad.com/emwave2/
While thinking about some descriptions for Bremsstrahlung:
And thought there were some interesting things to consider when playing with the frequency in relation to the size of the reflective or higher density object and what does it do to the space surrounding it etc..
I know this may deviate a bit from writings of Tesla, but this is me trying to simplify & analogize the Bremsstrahlung idea you brought up a few times. What do you think?
-----Also P.S.-----
I noticed that you may be missing some patents in your patent list pdf that were from Great Britain & Canada. I was trying to do some research on air compression and vacua and came across a patent that was unfamiliar to me in your list.
http://www.nuenergy.org/tesla-patents/
Intensional?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit