There is a design when making and doing follow-up of the debates when we are here, and there are questions and answers, and these are either fixed or free or both of these things. And there could be giving simulations on all the members in the debates, and we are wondering about what these debates should do, and which contributions they are eventually giving us when we are here.
And discussion papers and making the cores of all kinds of cores when we are here, that is just being humans as we are when we can be and when we are where we are, and any discussion is talking and/or writing about pros and cons when we are here, and we are jus in the organizations internally, there are interactive places between organizations and the markets, and we are having things externally in the markets, and we are just doing something domestically when we are freezing the content and the structure of the markets to be fewer actors than the open markets of any participants when we are here.
And we are just laughing about the debates, and things are also done in seriously ways, and that is since people are thinking that the more the debates can be contentious, and not believing in anything anywhere when we should be opponents, and using the bounded rationality, we are just being here and there we are when we are here. And the markets are filled with persons meaning that or that, and we cannot be sure about these opinions, and things are either sensible or stupid about any guessings and statements we are making and responsible for when we are where we are.
So, what is a sensible debate? Well, there should be a beginning and a conclusion, and there should be the main thing of eating the body of the fish, filled with arguments that are for and against the issue or the problem that we are investigating when we are here.
So, any debate as well as the market arguments should be a conviction of statements, and what is really the case, and what is really what we are believing and thinking and feeling about when we are listening to someone, or just creating the messages in better and in stronger and in more unique ways, and the next contribution and making questions and conflicts about ordinary perception, that is how we are making the best debates and dissertations, and we are just normally and ordinary as humans when we are meaning the same things as many people being where they are in the real life. And making questions about what is perceived as obvious, and making good arguments about telling the market why we should have the products we are selling, and telling them why they should give an economic support to the organization or foundation. And we are either mentally oriented or we are just thinking about how things are being done in practice in many places, and there should not just be theories in the markets, and there should also be statements and methods and data there. And we should do things alone, and also sometimes doing cooperation about how things are, and how they could be understood.
So, what is really the secrets about giving good debates? Well, if we are listening to things giving agreement or in oppositions, that is really a kind of being a human being when we are using what we are thinking and feeling, and we are just doing associations when being where we are, and the more we know, the less we know, and we are just in the markets, to tell the people and the people we have around us, and we should do our best efforts using our energy and space and time, and we are just humans in relation to what is possible, and we should try to make some new things in the debates and in the markets in such ways that we are not just knowing all things that are coming.
Please do follow if you want to keep up with my next article. Any upvotes or resteems are hugely appreciated!
Latest article, check out :
On perceiving the new jogging wave in Norway; People are friendly and sporty, and they like to build the health when it is possible!
Sverre Larsen
Kristiansand, Norway
Follow us for blogs about travel, art, photo and articles
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
💯⚜2️⃣0️⃣2️⃣4️⃣ This is a manual curation from the @tipu Curation Project
@tipu curate
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Upvoted 👌 (Mana: 2/8) Get profit votes with @tipU :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank you, much appreciated :))
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit