| Task | Comment | Grade |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Three Altitudes | The triangle is clearly visible, the heights are visible, they are marked, the bases of the heights are well named. However, I would focus on the heights. That is, I would make them thicker lines than the triangle itself. | 1.5✅/1.6 |
| 2. Altitude, bisector, and median | The construction process is well described, three chevians are drawn from one point. It would be better to make the equality of angles a mark, not a numerical value, the same is true for the median. It would also be worth demonstrating the case when the angle C or B is obtuse and the base of the projection does not belong to the side BC, while the bases of the median and the bisectors will always belong. | 1.5✅/1.6 |
| 3. Medivan triangle | That's right, Cheva's theorem is also explained. When I was studying at school and university, I never heard of it and never came across it in books (and only now do I often come across it) | 1.6🌟✅/1.6 |
| 4. Orthic triangle | Okay, but I would add that a triangle does not always exist, in the case of an obtuse angle - the point of intersection of the altitudes will be outside the triangle. | 1.6✅/1.6 |
| 5. Incircle triangle | Well constructed and explained, but I would prefer not numerical notation of angle equality but corresponding symbols.)) | 1.6✅/1.6 |
| 6. Tree triangles | Yes, the process of constructing these triangles was described in the tasks above, but it would have been nice to demonstrate the change of all these triangles in animation. It's a pity that this was not shown. | 1.8✅/2 |
Total: 9,6🌟/ 10
Muchas gracias profesor por su verificación y observaciones que tendré muy en cuenta.
Saludos y feliz día..!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit