The Devil Is In The Details: The UN And The Quest For Global Power

in informationwar •  7 years ago  (edited)

01.jpg
Google Images

The John Birch Society enjoys less than a sterling reputation in many circles, even among conservatives, however, be that as it may, I look for truth wherever I find it regardless of the source... like the old saying goes, even a blind squirrel stumbles across an acorn every now and again- in the case of the Un, the JBS has stumbled across the Rock of Gibraltar- particularly when it comes to their history and agenda. This includes not only the United Nations but its parent organization and the myriad of governmental and non-governmental agiencies and foundations surrounding it.

Globalism as a paradigm for world government began long before the UN was ever thought of. Every nation state in history has dreamed of world domination from before Greece of antiquity through Hitler, the USSR and China to the present. The UN, however, is supposed to reverse the paradigm... their alleged antidote to dreams of world domination it seems, is world domination- an international "democratic" body to oversee global politics. The problem with this model is two-fold (at least)... First, every democracy in history has devolved into a tyranny: and second- all institutions, no matter how noble their purpose inevitably suffer the same fate as democracies and are taken over by their worst element... In this case the globalists who devised it using a Socialist/Communist model- totalitarianism at a global level. Unfortunately, the UN was never intended to be a democracy... and at a global level, there are no checks and balances- power is omnipresent and absolute.

History will show that the United Nations was behind many of the atrocities of the 20th Century (Nazi Germany notwithstanding)- particularly on the continent of Africa. It is the UN, at the behest of the globalists that keeps much of Africa in a state of neo-colonialism, raping it for her wealth of natural resources and human capital- sex, child and human trafficking... while at the same time supporting depopulation by backing military despots, forced abortions (they withhold financial aid unless strict population guidelines are adhered to), not to mention bogus vaccines foisted on them by "charitable foundations" and "philanthropists" such as the Clinton and Gates Foundations.

One philosophy driving the globalist agenda is that it's "inevitable" according to "experts." The purpose, of course, is to destroy national sovereignty and the nation state... the purpose is to provide global safety by acting as the policemen of the world. President John F Kennedy got Freedom From War (a UN program) into US public policy... the purpose is the transferral of all military power to the UN, a little at a time. Every war since WWII, regardless of how they're sold to the public has been a "police action," never a declared war... Korea, Vietnam and the rest were all multinational forces led for the most part by the US.

Unlike the UN, America was founded on the premise that rights were endowed by God... the purpose of government is to ensure that those rights are adhered to by the government itself along with outside forces. With the UN there is no such pretense... to the UN, rights are a "gift" from the state- just as with Socialism and Communism. Little by little these rights have been chipped away at (mostly by undercover agents of the UN, in one form or another). The UN and the powers behind it are primarily anti-American, even though those powers are mostly American themselves. America is the fly in the ointment preventing UN hegemony and the globalists have been using the "long march" of Cultural Marxism to destroy their only impediment... while at the same time supporting every thug and dictator coming down the pike.

The biggest supporter of the UN and its quest for global domination is the Council of Foreign Relations CFR, at least in America. Funded by the Rockefeller Foundation and others, it was the Rockefellers who donated the land under the UN Headquarters. The goal of the CFR is financial control of world economies... the Un is the enforcement mechanism. The CFR has dominated every White House since WWII. It is the UN behind the gun confiscation efforts we are seeing today. Their Treaty of Small Arms has been supported by every president except Trump. The Democratic Party is the American political face of the CFR and also behind the push to grab guns- their agenda is synonymous.

Blaming guns rather than people for gun violence is a UN propaganda campaign. Their CFR allies in government and NGO's that support them produce an illusion of public support- when in fact most Americans support the 2nd Amendment. The video in the link does an excellent job of uncovering their strategies, and it is the UN that's behind much of the environmental movement. The Earth Summit of 1992 in Rio was a masterpiece of UN propaganda... it was also where they introduced Agenda 21 and Sustainable Development... all a part of the CFR plan.

The CFR is the American wing of Tavistock Institute, the parent organization of a myriad of governmental and NGO's, think tanks, universities, corporations and foundations- all capable of mobilizing groups of people into mobs- ANTIFA is a great example. ANTIFA is mostly made up of college students, mobilized by radical professors associated with one or more of CFR organizations. So too is the Club of Rome, the environmental wing of the operation who produces phony studies on global warming and other environmental issues... All a part of CFR and Tavistock and the UN is the political apparatus.

13825648.jpg

U5dsRT1UAnwwU1RVKAb43TK21U3xTen.gif

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Who owns UN? of course the American and European , they can design games and impose rules that anybody whoever play with it that makes lose the game.

Yup... it's the Rothschild diaspora, both directly and indirectly. Somebody made a remark about the ICC court... when was the last time they prosecuted anybody important???

Americans and Europeans are ignorant sheep like most others. The power elite don't generally ascribe to any conventional nationality; borders don't exist for them. They pillage and evade tax wherever it suits them. With the possible exception of contrived 'nations' such as was/is being created by the Zionist cabal in the Middle East (and the U.S. and U.K. etc.), they are in effect aliens. Interestingly, Putin gave them the boot from Russia recently http://wikileaksnews.co/vladimir-putin-bans-rothschilds-entering-russia/

Curated for #informationwar (by @openparadigm)
Relevance: Exposing Globalists
Our Purpose

@richq11, you have certainly, hit on all of my favorite topics this week. First the water, now the one world government and the guns. It’s frightening that there are so many people that do not realize the implications of supporting these programs. 🐓🐓
“ There must be some kind of way outa here said the joker to the thief,” Jimi Hendrix

I made a comment in one of the other posts that people seldom read past the headlines, so when they hear about these programs, they always sound good. You have to understand UNspeak to understand what's behind the noble sounding titles.

What is behind their speak is pure greed and a gluttoness need for power. When it reaches the depths of such power don’t the mighty elites realize there will indeed be fighting amoungst themselves for even more?

WARNING - The message you received from @muhammadsyahril is a CONFIRMED SCAM!
DO NOT FOLLOW any instruction and DO NOT CLICK on any link in the comment!
For more information, read this post:
https://steemit.com/steemit/@arcange/phishing-site-reported-uppervotes-dot-ml
Please consider to upvote this warning if you find my work to protect you and the platform valuable. Your support is welcome!

I figured as much... I get those all the time. If it isn't someone I know, I don't click on anything. Thanks!!!

Hi @richq11, (1) what you explained has been a serious complaint of third countries, thereby it pumped the against spirit for getting fairness through religion approach, at this case, extremistm issue was blowed up then. (2) I am wondering with your thinking of "phony studies on global warming and other environmental issues" since it has been massive activity of global scientists.

  1. most of the religious extremism if paid for and fueled by the UN. The violence feeds into their plan because it gives them an excuse to send "peacekeepers."
  2. The "massive activity" is politically motivated not by science. They've (the "scientists") have inverted the scientific method starting with the conclusion they want and are scrambling to find "evidence." That's why there is massive activity! Climate change has nothing to do with Man, CO2 (which the plants need to live), or any of the other excuses. Climate change is natural, it's caused by Sunspots.

I've just written a new article on how the UN - together with Israel - developed a "refugee"-resettlement-plan from Israel to Germany without even asking the German government. Isn't this ridiculous? The UN obviously thinks they can do whatever they like. I don't wan't global dictatorship, I prefer national souvereignity and true democracy!
https://steemit.com/politics/@rclager/netanjahu-italy-and-germany-shall-take-african-refugees-from-israel

Good article... we have a tag, #informationwar that we use to counter the MSM narrative. You should check it out and check out our discord channel. We are in an information war for the minds of America and the world... The more people we have the faster the word gets out.

Thanks, I will use that tag in future.

Get the US out of the UN and the UN out of the US!

The following statement is incorrect.

"History will show that the United Nations was behind many of the atrocities of the 20th Century (Nazi Germany notwithstanding)- particularly on the continent of Africa."

The United Nations is a front.

Evidence:

  1. International law is proof of world governance.
  2. U.C.C The United Commercial Code is proof of world governance.
  3. One can see the evidence @socioecohistory has provided and clearly see the Cheetah bot is not as advertised. There website: https://socioecohistory.wordpress.com/ has lots of evidence showing who is the driving force behind the United Nations, but you will have to figure it out for yourself so don't just believe me.

Hint: What is the difference between a Zionist and a Jew?

The Rockefellers are the funding mechanism (one of the largest) behind Zionism. They're related to the Rothschilds... in fact that's who gave them their start.

  1. There is only international law for subject nations, not ruling ones.
  2. The ICC is merely a tool of the US State Department. Read Global Search and Seizure, by Sterling Johnson (I wrote the review for it in the Journal of International Law)
  3. I don't click unfamiliar links
  1. I agree that is the fact, but not how they put it forth.
  2. Don't know what the ICC is in reference to.
  3. I don't blame you!

The Rockefeller's are visibly agents on the political and financial side representing the Commercial interest. It is the agents of the sea that we do not actually see that the Rockefeller's are presenting.

The international court... as far as I'm aware they haven't prosecuted anyone of note although they do issue warrants that never seem to get served. They seem for the most part toothless.

I don't know if you've studied Tavistock at all. They're like a web of NGO's, think tanks, etc funded by the Rockefeller, Ford, and other foundations. The way they're set up is too complex to explain here. I wrote a 9 part series and still didn't explain it enough for my satisfaction. They were behind the Beatles, for one thing. Their goal is control society on a global scale

To me Tavistock defines what is meant by De Facto Conspiracy Corporation. While not all conspiracies are bad Tavistock is beyond bad and actually fits what is meant by the word Evil. Meaning anti life. One of the things that social inequality studies show is that control is not good for living beings. Spontaneous order naturally occurs and is good for life. Life reacts violently to artificial control and is why Tavistock works in secret. Their goal may be to control society, but unfortunately the more success they have the more life dies.

The savage is not the living being that lives in the forest, but the one who destroys it.

Beautifully put! Their organizational structure is so convoluted it's impossible to tell "who's in charge." It's councils within councils that spread out through every facet of government and society... I call it the Kudzu effect.

I call it the actions of someone who knows they are guilty of crimes. There is a silver lining to all of this, but unfortunately I am not at the liberty to explain. The best thing people can do is put forth the law. In America that means getting with their local committee of safety and put forth the law. It would help if people got a civilized education at nationallibertyalliance.org they have a fee civics course that shares the vested interest of American society.

Most of the rest of the Western World has some form of common law, and are even now being re-educated as to what and how it works. The Magna Carta is a great start on that.

I'll have a look at their website... as far as common law goes, I always thought we borrowed from the Brits.

I just wanted to note that evidence of something is not proof. The mere fact that international law exists doesn't prove it's anything more than code regulating the interactions of sovereign entities. Certainly international law existed long before there were Rothschilds at all.

I reckon we all can be characterized as unique in our understanding and grasp of facts. As long as we don't set the bar too high, we can work together to resolve our common interests.

Oooo K

Rubbish. A commentary of drivel. Supposing your theories about the globalist conspiracy are indeed accurate, I am not convinced by your writing.

Well, it ain't all high-falutin' and flow'ry, but it's true.

That's good writing to me.

Maybe instead of determining whether something is true or not by how it's said, you'd better judge how convincing a thing is by checking sources and verifying them for yourself.

That also works for me.

You don't work for me, though, so you can do whatever you want.

If you were seeking to convince, it would help if you wrote convincingly which means tying together the facts in a cogent argument.

It would only serve a purpose for those that could comprehend such.

You aren't interested.

That's why you make pretense that what I said wasn't cogent.

But I was interested. That's why I'm responding.

I'm sympathetic to criticism of the UN and Atlantic arrogance. I've read the biographies of all the previous Secretary Generals and harbor some wonky conspiratorial theories myself.

But what've written here is just silly, I'm sorry to say: you write only "for those that could comprehend such." That's a conspiracy, if I ever heard one. (Not to say your theories are all wrong.)

Good luck. Now I end our conversation.

The OP didn't bother to respond to your rebuke. My reference to those that could comprehend was predicated on it's suffix, that you had no interest in comprehension, and thus weren't such a party.

That's no conspiracy, rather recognition that the facts can only be related to one willing to learn them.

Your comments indicate no interest whatsoever. Naught but vituperation and ad hominae have issued from you.

Even so, I recommended that you research and ascertain for yourself the truth of the OP's statements, as that alone would prove them to your satisfaction, and nothing else could. I'd recommend you do, as you suddenly evince interest in the UN and it's agenda. If that interest is genuine, the current scandals involving blue helmets and child sex trafficking, or any of the topics mentioned by OP are all quite verifiable with minimal effort, which even a base primate incapable of polite speech could manage.

Koko the Gorilla could even lie, once blaming her pet kitten for ripping a steel sink from it's secure mount. I'd have loved to see what she searched online, were she granted internet access. She probably could have verified any number of the contentions in OP's post.

I'm sure you could do it, if your interest isn't feigned.

If you choose, you may now have the last word.