Unbanked in America & Cryptocurrency Part One

in investing •  5 years ago  (edited)

We call people “unbanked” because they don’t have access to banks and/or don’t use available banking services for a variety of reasons.

We often hear about “the unbanked”
in poor developing countries and how cryptocurrencies can help them by providing them the equivalent of banking services; such as a place to store their job or business related earnings and electronic methods of paying bills or transferring wealth.

Now when it comes to America many people assume that everyone here has access to and uses traditional banks for banking services, but apparently that’s not the case. In fact the number of “unbanked” in America is so large that it has attracted the attention of both banks and the government entity that guarantees the bank deposits of currency or fiat called the FDIC.

This is a recent article I read:
“A survey by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) found that 7% of households (9 million) in the US are unbanked and an additional 19.9% of households (24.5 million) are underbanked. Several counties in the state of Georgia are among the worst affected areas. According to reports from the FDIC over the past five years, Atlanta, Georgia is in the top ten of most unbanked cities in the country, and more than one in ten households have no involvement with traditional banks. Around 30% of residents are underbanked, meaning they might have checking accounts, but have to rely on other kinds of services like pawn shops, check-cashing and payday loan companies to get cash and credit,” The state of Georgia now has a total of 101 bitcoin ATM kiosks, making it the third largest US market for bitcoin ATMs behind the cities of Chicago and New York.”
Source

This is the study by the FDIC;
“2017 FDIC National Survey of Unbanked and Underbanked Households
The FDIC is committed to expanding Americans’ access to safe, secure, and affordable banking services. The FDIC National Survey of Unbanked and Underbanked Households is one contribution to this end. To assess the inclusiveness of the banking system, and in partial response to a statutory mandate, the FDIC has conducted the survey biennially since 2009.1 The most recent survey was administered in June 2017 in partnership with the U.S. Census Bureau, collecting responses from more than 35,000 households. The survey provides estimates of the proportion of U.S. households that do not have an account at an insured institution, and the proportion that have an account but obtained (nonbank) alternative financial services in the past 12 months. The survey also provides insights that may inform efforts to better meet the needs of these consumers within the banking system. Estimates from the 2017 survey indicate that 6.5 percent of households in the United States were unbanked in 2017. This proportion represents approximately 8.4 million households. An additional 18.7 percent of U.S. households (24.2 million) were underbanked, meaning that the household had a checking or savings account but also obtained financial products and services outside of the banking system.
Source

The 2017 survey examines a number of additional topics, including the methods that banked households used to access accounts, bank branch visits, use of prepaid cards, use of alternative financial services, saving for unexpected expenses or emergencies, use of credit, and the methods that households used to conduct financial transactions in a typical month. See economicinclusion.gov for survey findings, the ability to generate custom tables and charts using 2017 and earlier years of survey data, and data downloads and documentation.”
Source

Conclusion
The FDIC pays for statisticians to survey a certain percentage of people in very large cities like New York, Los Angeles and Atlanta, Georgia. Interestingly enough in cities with large numbers of “unbanked” people there are also large numbers of Cryptocurrency ATMs! Atlanta, Georgia has the largest number of unbanked of the cities surveyed in 2017. Georgia has the second largest number of Bitcoin ATM per state at 101. This statistic is from Coinsource a Bitcoin ATM provider who reports they keep track of their ATMs and those of their competition. I think this suggests that large numbers of people on America are unbanked and using other non-traditional businesses for their banking needs. I think the large number of cryptocurrency ATMs popping up in these same cities suggests that cryptocurrency is a viable alternative in these cities to provide some banking needs. I think it may not be to far fetched a thought to propose that to a degree adoption of cryptocurrency is occurring silently and possibly amongst the unbanked.

But that’s my humble opinion.

✍🏼 by Shortsegments

References:

  1. https://www.fdic.gov/householdsurvey/
  2. https://www.fdic.gov/householdsurvey/2017/2017execsumm.pdf
  3. https://www.fdic.gov/householdsurvey/2017/2017report.pdf
Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Interesting statistics. It's new to me that there are so many unbanked and underbanked people in USA. The problem, with trying to serve the unbanked in developing countries, is the lack of infrastructure. In that case, it seems to make more sense to target underbanked or unbanked people in developed countries first

Posted using Partiko Android

Thank you for your comment. This is an important point. Many crypto coin projects dream of getting rich serving the unbanked in underdeveloped countries, but find the challenge is the lack of infrastructure.
Very developed and well funded projects like DASH have been trying to serve this population in South America, with a focus on countries like Venezuela. But the challenges in infrastructure, use of mobiles by the populace to access the internet and challenges of dealing with unfamiliar internet service providers, mobile services providers and language barriers have been very difficult hurdles to overcome.

One of the challenges of developed countries is point of view. We can’t solve problems in underdeveloped countries using our own point of view as our only lens, we need to see the issues from the viewpoint of the populace, only then will we understand the challenges, as you so aptly point out.

This of course isn’t a criticism of developed countries efforts, it just an observation about a more efficient path to a solution.

Interesting numbers. I didn’t know the unbanked existed in such large numbers. The connection between ATM and Bitcoin could reflect the affluent in those cities, but your idea is just as valid as my mine at this point. I wonder how Walmart Coin would affect the unbanked?

I think that can be answered by an article on Walmart and the unbanked.