unfortunately this is too circumstantial to be taken as any proof.
the quality of the camera and other factors can also be the reason for the things you point to here
RE: 12 lies in 44, resp. 3 seconds, can anyone beat that? flight-175
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
12 lies in 44, resp. 3 seconds, can anyone beat that? flight-175
What do you mean? Like everything else on the video is fine except the artificial airplane and so we say a quality is an issue and therefore it is not unreliable? Doesn't sound very logical. From common security cameras, you have often much worse records and are usually ok for a trial. Moreover this is just one small piece in all evidence that can be used.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
the quality of the capture (the image chip on the camera), the way it was saved (on tape), compression of the video and more, all contirbute to a reduction in quality and clipping errors that may explain those things as well as what you are proposing.
i think there are a lot of fishy things about 9.11, but this is wasted energy in my view. if you want to enlighten people and change minds it's better to focus on things that are harder to deny. like how building 7 went down without ever being touched by any terrorists.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Sure, but compression cannot constantly change aircraft profile and it also it would not select specific places in moving object. It's not wasted time, more issues can open more eyes. Yes, WTC7 is the best place where to start and it's most evident place where the fraud is obvious.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit