Activist Holds Up Sign Saying Police Hate Free Speech, So they Arrest Him to Prove Him Right

By Matt Agorist

 Stamford, CT — Free speech and liberty activist, Michael Picard had  harmed no one, had not committed a crime, and was merely expressing his  right to free speech by claiming the Stamford PD dislikes free speech.  Indeed, within just a few minutes, the chief of police himself came out  to prove Picard right. 

Last Thursday, Picard held a sign that said, “F*ck Free Speech  —Stamford PD,” merely attempting to point out the gross violations of  the First Amendment committed by the department after they arrested  another activist, Michael Friend, for holding up a different sign  warning drivers of a distracted driving checkpoint ahead. 

Friend was appearing before a judge last week after being charged  with allegedly interfering in police duties by warning drivers of a  checkpoint ahead. Because Friend was arrested for merely expressing his  free speech by holding up a sign that said “Cops Ahead” to warn drivers,  Picard went to the courthouse to voice his concern. Picard had on his GoPro camera which filmed the entire interaction,  however, police confiscated it as evidence after his arrest. Luckily,  Picard’s friend, Dawud Talib was also at the courthouse to film the  interaction. 

After a few minutes in front of the courthouse, Picard was confronted  by Police Chief Jon Fontneau, who warned the free speech activist to  stop expressing himself, or go to jail. Picard, knowing he was well within his rights to hold this sign up in  front of a courthouse, refused. In response to Picard’s refusal to  censor himself, Fontneau had him arrested and handcuffed. Picard was  subsequently charged with breach of peace. 

“I found the sign to be offensive in front of police headquarters as  people are coming in and out,” Fontneau said. “I don’t think our  day-to-day residents should have to put up with something like that.” 

That decision, however, it not up to Fontneau. Indeed, this precedent  has already been established in the United States Supreme Court case,  Cohen v. California. The Court overturned a man’s conviction for the  “crime” of disturbing the peace for wearing a jacket in the courthouse  that displayed the phrase, “F*ck the Draft.” 

Picard could not comment specifically on the case, however, he did  note that “They have a checkpoint for everything nowadays,” adding, “They can’t stop infringing on your rights.”

 TFTP spoke with Picard’s attorney, Joseph R. Sastre who explained how unjust this charge against his client is. Connecticut’s breach of peace statute reads as follows: 

“A person is guilty of breach of the peace in the second degree when, with intent to cause inconvenience, annoyance or alarm,  or recklessly creating a risk thereof, such person: (1) Engages in  fighting or in violent, tumultuous or threatening behavior in a public  place; or (2) assaults or strikes another; or (3) threatens to commit  any crime against another person or such other person’s property; or (4)  publicly exhibits, distributes, posts up or advertises any offensive,  indecent or abusive matter concerning any person; or (5) in a public  place, uses abusive or obscene language or makes an obscene gesture; or  (6) creates a public and hazardous or physically offensive condition by  any act which such person is not licensed or privileged to do. For  purposes of this section, “public place” means any area that is used or  held out for use by the public whether owned or operated by public or  private interests.”

“I think the first sentence says it all,” Sastre told TFTP. “A person  is acting like a mere fool when he sets out with intent to cause  inconvenience, annoyance or alarm. Charging protesters with this statute  section, or another like it, sends a message that the police don’t  think you have an opinion on anything. No, to them, a guy  holding a sign is just an attention seeker, out to make a spectacle of  himself. It is the equivalent of the abusive husband who tells his wife  to ‘stop acting so hysterical’ when she tries to get him to consider her  feelings, or to treat her better.” 

For those who follow TFTP closely, you’ve probably seen our reports  on Picard before, which is why the police department may have it out for  him. In 2015, Picard was also arrested for his free speech. This time,  however, police confiscated his phone and then proceeded to record  themselves trying to fabricate ways to charge this innocent man. 

“To me, Michael Picard’s case, and Michael Friend’s for that matter,  makes it clear that the Stamford Police Department needs new  leadership.” Sastre noted. “But what is even more distressing to me  about this case is that the Stamford Police seem to have reached out to a  prosecutor in the courthouse to ask how to deal with a man holding a  sign, and that the prosecutor suggested that he be arrested. 

 Proving once again that freedom of speech really only means that you  have the right to say, as loudly as you want, that you agree with the  police state.” If you’d like to peacefully voice your concern about the video below, you can do so at the Stamform police Facebook page here. 

---

 We are the Free Thought Project — a hub for Free Thinking conversations about the promotion of liberty and the daunting task of government accountability. All of our content was created by our team of artists and writers. Learn more about us on our website thefreethoughtproject.com.