RE: The End of Criminalization: On Free Will, Accountability, and Compassion

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

The End of Criminalization: On Free Will, Accountability, and Compassion

in philosophy •  8 years ago 

The way I understand it is that author means to take homeless people into a system with specialists, facilities, funding to help them out. We have health care systems to treat medically ill, similarly we need to reform welfare systems to be able to extend hands to homeless people.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Oh not talking about the homeless per se @dangis @felixxx, I tihnk what i really meant is not to criminalize people by default (which is punishment), so i went for an opposing verb which is healing?

What I don't agree on is, that you sound like you want the government to fix it.

I believe we should decriminalize and then get the government out of people's lifes.

A state funded welfare system like the health care system can never synthesize tolerance or inclusiveness - let alone compassion.

@dangis that's a great idea. ironically, it's already been tried and the programs were done away with for a variety of reasons that ultimately had to do with money. Take a look at this article if you're interested. Of course, it's only one article but it paints a fairly cursory yet not inaccurate portrait of what happened. http://www.nytimes.com/1984/10/30/science/how-release-of-mental-patients-began.html?pagewanted=all

You have free will, no matter what others may tell you. However, you can only be as free as your environment and mental life. Take for example, slavery used to be acceptable in the United States. Are supporters of slavery exercising their own free will to support the idea of slavery, regardless whether if its right or wrong? If its so commonplace in a culture, it may never occur to someone that it's wrong.

What if they don't want 'help' ?