Flagging is attacking somebody's rewards. It's essentially money that belongs to the platform. Once the reward is paid out, that money then belongs to the person.
To then attack the money that belongs to a person, regardless of who agrees and why, would make a joke of the platform. Why do I care if 2/3 of highly reputable people agreed? I don't know them. I don't know what their motivation is.
Your idea is ridiculous, and it would be the end of Steem as a currency of any legitimacy or value
It's not attacking money on the platform. That's a very poor way to describe voting on reward distribution.
Because if you don't care what 2/3 of reputable people on this platform agree to then you might as well go invest in a platform that isn't a Social Network.
You think that giving tools that help the community police itself and stop for example someone maliciously spamming or abusing the system with their shares, which would directly devalue and have possible drastic consequences over growth and competing with platforms that aren't helpless to someone spamming child porn or some other faces of death gif, who are equipped with the tools to remove the noise, banish the abusers, lock the funds up and force a dialogue to open if they ever want their money back.
If you invested in this then you ought to consider that there is no mass adaptation until these bridges are crossed, and they are there, simply because you invested into it doesn't mean you can use your investment to abuse others with it. People will always have a problem with that, regardless how "hidden" it is it will never be a solution and good luck seeing something stable from a currency that backs "that" social network.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You're aware that these tools are built into the blockchain, we would simply need to go through the top 19 witnesses. They literally have the power to rewrite the code and form a consensus on adapting it, but giving people that are veterans some of those tools would be the deat of steem as a currrency of any legitimacy or value.. Are you aware the reason ETH split and what came of that split? Are you aware of the discusion around ETH concerning something similar to what I am describing?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
What's not legitimate about refunding and reimbursing people for stolen accounts? Is it that far of a stretch to allow people to form a consensus on these issues and resolve them, wouldn't that give legitimacy and trust inherently because the tools exist? Will there be bad actors? Sure, but that's the point of forming some consensus over these issues and resolving them, unless you wish to be stuck, here now.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit