With self-voting I have mixed feelings, there does have to be a reason to hold Steem Power, and how ever a person got it, it is theirs.
I agree it isn't good for the long-term health of the platform.
Consider the power of your flag.
With self-voting I have mixed feelings, there does have to be a reason to hold Steem Power, and how ever a person got it, it is theirs.
I agree it isn't good for the long-term health of the platform.
Ok, that makes sense now on why its written into the system. Well maybe it should be restricted to just posts and not comments. Or maybe have a limit based on a percentage of your SP.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You've got the Midas touch.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Absolutely amazing.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This is phenomenal!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I think, at the least, self-votes shouldn't be 100% votes. If we put the cap at say, 50%, that would mitigate this problem a bit.
Or maybe, make it so that you have to pay a fee to upvote your own content?(which is then included in the curation rewards) I mean, technically you are promoting your own content, which isn't free on any platform other than Steemit.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit