why don't you make these "meetings" public? rather than keeping everything a secret thinking the community is just gonna agree with everything you come up with? are your communications gonna be as malicious as justin's?
RE: Announcing the Social Blockchain Working Group
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Announcing the Social Blockchain Working Group
The meetings we have had were mainly focused on agreeing to this announcement and the phrasing of it :) The plan is to do as much in public as possible. My preference would be through a Steem community
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
thank you. i hope you understand that a general statement like "a new blockchain" is to a lot of people just as ambiguous as justin's "token swap". i also have no idea how the 8 of you came to a conclusion that a new blockchain is gonna benefit steemians, or exactly how you plan on delivering "improved decentralization".
i'm pissed off that dictators like ned/justin are still controlling the blockchain, but i have nothing against you wanting to work on projects that motivate you the most. perhaps instead of a single post, there might be less confusion if you guys record a discussion and let people decide for themselves whether it's gonna be a benefit or not.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Great idea, thanks for the feedback
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit