Steem experiment: Burn post #563

burnpost (82) in steem • 5 years ago

Burn post for January 26.

All rewards received by @burnpost are eventually burned. More info.

To provide additional support, vote for the @burnpost comment(s) below.

Later votes reduce Trending, which some community members prefer.

To view proof of burn, visit https://steemd.com/@burnpost

steem experimental burn-post

5 years ago by burnpost (82)

$14.72

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!

Sort Order:

burnpost (82) · 5 years ago

Rewards from this comment #6 will be added to the post rewards for burning

burnpost (82) · 5 years ago

Rewards from this comment #5 will be added to the post rewards for burning

burnpost (82) · 5 years ago

Rewards from this comment #4 will be added to the post rewards for burning

burnpost (82) · 5 years ago

Rewards from this comment #1 will be added to the post rewards for burning

burnpost (82) · 5 years ago

Rewards from this comment #2 will be added to the post rewards for burning

burnpost (82) · 5 years ago

Rewards from this comment #3 will be added to the post rewards for burning

burnpost (82) · 5 years ago

Rewards from this comment #7 will be added to the post rewards for burning

burnpost (82) · 5 years ago

Rewards from this comment #8 will be added to the post rewards for burning

burnpost (82) · 5 years ago

Rewards from this comment #9 will be added to the post rewards for burning

joshman (70) · 5 years ago

Later votes reduce Trending, which some community members prefer.

This should be easy peasy for @therealwolf / @smartsteem (20-25% of the total vote)

azircon (69) · 5 years ago

$0.00

acidyo (80) · 5 years ago

(voting to counter the malicious downvote not that I necessarily agree with the message or even read it) :P

smooth (70) · 5 years ago

It's perfectly fine with me. I've been voting late all along, most recently at about 5 days.

azircon (69) · 5 years ago

Excellent! I hope @therealwolf sees this.

therealwolf (75) · 5 years ago

I've reduced the weight on it drastically for now. The real solution would be to either hide those posts from the trending page or to have a separate tab for it.

azircon (69) · 5 years ago

$0.00

smooth (70) · 5 years ago (edited)

I didn't say it was "the solution". It is one thing that does reduce trending, which can be used right now.

I mostly agree with @therealwolf that the better solution is for UIs should have better tools for deciding what shows up on the front page other than just votes/payouts. The latter should go on a leaderboard and dedicated curation tools.

azircon (69) · 5 years ago

Yeah thanks for the clarification. I think we are making progress :)

Thank you for being patient with me.

Show 6 more replies

joshman (70) · 5 years ago

@smartsteem uses its own autovote mechanism AFAIK, which is @therealwolf's project. That's specifically why I picked on him! :-)

$0.00

azircon (69) · 5 years ago

And there is some human interaction and engagement on a bot post! Viola! This blockchain in alive!

therealwolf (75) · 5 years ago

;) I didn't implement comment voting for Smartsteem, which is why I was voting higher on the main-posts. I do understand that people get frustrated with seeing automated posts on the trending page, but this could be fixed with UI. (i.e reducing the weight regarding trending on them, or moving those over to a separate section and hiding them for main-trending)

$0.00

phgnomo (64) · 5 years ago

You are a supporter of @sbdpotato and @burnpost?

Please, consider reading a counter argument:

https://steempeak.com/sbdpotato/@phgnomo/how-create-value-on-steem-or-how-sbdpotato-and-burnpost-is-hurting-steem-more-than-it-is-helping

$0.00

ae1000 (25) · 5 years ago

Great

$0.00

arcange (73) · 5 years ago (edited)

$0.00