RE: Why I won't support Jerry Banfield anymore - JerryCoin

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Why I won't support Jerry Banfield anymore - JerryCoin

in steem •  6 years ago  (edited)

Who is they.

In 2016, there were 14.6 million members in the U.S., down from 17.7 million in 1983. The percentage of workers belonging to a union in the United States (or total labor union "density") was 10.7%, compared to 20.1% in 1983.[1][2] Union membership in the private sector has fallen under 7%[3] — levels not seen since 1932. From a global perspective, the density in 2013 was 7.7% in France, 18.1% in Germany, 27.1% in Canada, and 88.9% in Iceland, which is currently highest in the world.

I should have not used the word collectivism, yes there have been race-based things to distract from the class-based notions.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

i interpreted collectivism as socialist agenda. The Democrats have been pushing for quite a bit more they just haven't been able to do it yet. If it werent for the fact that Europe's collectivism is facing visible problems then i believe they would have been more successful

Democrats are corporatist. Targeted attempts to spur collectivism among individual subgroups is just an attempt to break up the power of the united lower classes and increase infighting.

100% agreed, but they're corporatists who also want more control over the corporations themselves, which inturn makes them socialists/communist/marxist/what ever you want to call themists as long as you accept that they have become extreme left wing

it doesnt matter what you call your rulers, whether it be Government, Royalty, Masters, God, or Corporations. What matter is the degree of control they seek/posses over the life of their subjects