Not being familiar with either of those two users I opend the post you took issue with and my thoughts where.

Wait whats the problem this is clearly satirical simply poking a bit of fun at what could be any of the hundreds of armchair investor's that believe that they have the numbers crunched on such a volatile market. He didn't name anyone no harm, no foul so whats the problem?

Then I went over to @haejin and the issue became clear the whole format and style had been ripped.

I'm still undecided tho.

• Does it remain simple satire or is it an attack.
• Is it plagiarism? Could a resonable person confuse one work for the other? Very likley.
• If its genuine satire should it be condemned? Hell no, satire is important it helps us hold up a light to our behaviour and helps to break the echo chamber effect of social media.

“I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.”
Beatrice Evelyn Hall