RE: Meet Steem's #1 Author!

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Meet Steem's #1 Author!

in steemit •  8 years ago 

Many (probably nearly everyone) comes to steemit as a way to make money from blogging and engaging in social media. @mindhunter has currently found a way to do that better than anyone else currently on this platform. If the way he does this is not acceptable to the community then we should come together and figure out how to fix the problem... much like your analogy, but without the violence. Just like the Steemit platform was created to function.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Many (probably nearly everyone) comes to fascism as a way to make money from controlling the population. @hitler has currently found a way to do that better than anyone else currently in this country.

also it is actually with violence. Making a profit without work means others must get what they produced taken away. That is done through wage labor, which is only kept in existence through violence.

this book explains it well

https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1916/imp-hsc/

On Steemit it isn't done with wage labor, so your point about violence isn't valid in this case.

Since Steemit is entirely voluntary, no potential violence exists. However, there is an indirect promotion of violence, as I do make money from labor, and so by decreasing the rewards I am able to generate on a platform where I can do so without being subject to the violence of the state, then I am prompted to rely more on my wage labor subject to that violence.

Starve or work for the ruling class. It doesn't matter if you choose where you work it's not voluntary by definition.

I am no good at either, having tried both.

I like to fix stuff for the people I work for, so I do the work. I like to leave behind a trailer, for example, that was uninhabitable when I got there, and now the landlady of the trailer park is jelly of how nice it is.

I leave a legacy of improvements that benefit those I get to serve. I don't do work for 'the man' although I have personally been literally worked as a slave, for more than three years. Forced labor without pay, under pain of death - actual slavery.

I lived through not because I am particularly fond of myself, but because my kids are fond of me, and would have been devastated by my loss. It was a lot of trouble to endure for them, but they are worth it to me.

The crackers in the trailer park are about as far from the ruling class as I can get, so that's why I work to improve their lot.

Paging @commentwealth...come in @commentwealth, do you read? Over.

what is commentwealth

It's a new account that tries to upvote quality comments that will probably be lost otherwise (several layers deep, etc.)

Steemit's reward pool is, indeed, a zero-sum game. For every over-rewarded whale, there are 1000 minnows who quit and do not buy Steem. That's why I liked your comment.

Making people work more for another to earn unjust reward is several layers removed from direct violence, but it's still basically an extrapolated form of slavery.

Well said. This discussion is fun to read =)

"Making people work more for another to earn unjust reward is several layers removed from direct violence, but it's still basically an extrapolated form of slavery."

forcing somebody to do something at gun point is a layer or two away from violence.

"Steemit's reward pool is, indeed, a zero-sum game."

Payment for labor itself is a zero-sum game. That makes everything that comes out of capitalism one.

It seems like you think I'm arguing with you; I wasn't. I don't get your first point.

Payment for labor is not zero sum, that's silly. If I pay you $10 to produce a widget and I sell that widget for $20, we both gained, as did whichever market participant wanted the widget enough to pay for it.

If all human labor were a zero sum game, we'd still be living in grass huts...or caves.

Payment for labor is what I said.

I produce a $20 object out of goods worth $10. The value of my labor is $10. To get a profit the owner must pay me less than $10. If he does not his business tanks.

The only way to get profit is to pay less than the labor is worth. That is zero sum.

There is no such thing as a $20 object. If you think so, we cannot reconcile, because you are adhering to demonstrably false nonsense like the labor theory of value.

It's just so easy to disprove your philosophical underpinnings a literal child could do it.

I have a glass of water in front of me. You try to sell me a bottle of water. How much of a good is it? 0$

Now I'm in the desert dying of thirst. How much of a good is it? $10000.

I can't believe anyone is still a communist past first grade.

That's not zero-sum, you're being deliberately reductive.

The owner has access to markets, marketing, distribution that allows him to get a much higher price for a good than the laborer does.

You can try to sell your wood furniture for $100 as a craftsman at a flea market and waste your time on sales, marketing, returns and all kinds of crap.

Or you can make it for Rooms To Go and let them handle that shit.

It's not always zero sum, it depends on the individual relationship.

Painting with such broad strokes (and incessantly arguing with everyone, even those philosophically disposed to your side) just pushes people away from your philosophy even more.

" I don't get your first point."

To sum it up, it doesn't matter how many layers of abstraction it has, the threat of violence is still violence.

OK, what I didn't get was that I was clearly agreeing with you, and you seemed to be arguing with me.

I guess I needed to be more clear. You seem argumentative.

"It seems like you think I'm arguing with you"

That might not have been your goal but debate is one of the few ways to achieve a true understanding of anything.

It was neither the goal or the outcome, and your deliberately reductive, absolutist argumentation style is intellectually dishonest. (See my other comment on zero-sum, which you falsely asserted all commerce is against demonstrable, clear fact).

In your world, all laborers are apparently equally skilled at sales, a completely different and unrelated skills. The division of labor is not a thing you believe in, apparently.