... — SteemCN

Sort Order:

yerartes (51) · 6 years ago

my sincere answer is this: i thought it was the computer.
Thanks to this, I know of the advanced shrub, thanks to science, that works with solar energy... Thanks to the internet we know the world and we know the advances of today..

but without a doubt, I will always bet on nature. as thanks to steemit one finds out about this haha

$0.62

1 vote

[-]

nancybriti (70) · 6 years ago

I think those are some of the great ironies we live, @rok-sivante! Today I was just reading how in China the first genetically manipulated twin boys have already been made. Human beings have been playing God for a long time! If nature is imperfect, why are more and more inventions trying to reproduce the benefits of nature. More and more people are betting on artificiality, giving them the value not only of beauty but also of quality. I think there will come a time when the artificial will be the norm and the natural the exception! May God see us! Have a nice night.

$0.40

3 votes

[-]

erh.germany (64) · 6 years ago

The human being as conscious of himself has at some point begun to feel uncomfortable in his skin and to ask himself many questions. This feeling alien to one's own life is the other side of consciousness. As many wonderful good sides there are to being aware that one knows that one thinks and deceives oneself to be an objective observer of one's thoughts, it is also difficult to accept the strangeness within ourselves.

Instead, man has experienced himself as separate from nature and projects this fear of separation onto activities to defeat nature. Some claim that we are still instinct-driven and that the deterministic view one can control everything and play God is unfortunately a mental failure of what we humans are capable of: to integrate ourselves into the eternal cycle of becoming and passing away and not to see this as painful (death and birth). We focus too much on pain and too little on the fact that pain did not exist without joy. One does not work without the other.

We have the myopic way of looking at things. We screen out any things that are not immediately important to us, looking out for danger. Fascination for doom might be neutralized if we would say "why bother about that?"

$0.00

[-]

rasamuel (63) · 6 years ago

Wow thats some brilliant stuff right there. I would have gone for the coffee, mainly because I had no idea what th the shrub thingy was. But after reading the mail now I'm torn between the coffee and the self replicating $4 houseplant.

Ok maybe the houseplant takes it - by just a little.

bias towards easily identifiable technology

Definitely. Its understandable too because most of the times we go for whatever appeals most to the eye. It would be so cool to start appreciating those who focus on the little things. If not more than then probably just as the people who make fancy laptops and teslas and send people to the moon for a vacation.

Cheers!

$0.00

1 vote

[-]

rok-sivante (75) · 6 years ago

Well, if the answer is subjective, there probably are a number of hardcore coffee lovers/addicts who’d still agree the coffee takes it... haha!

$1.66

3 votes

[-]

brightsun (50) · 6 years ago

My eyes was falling frequently on common shrub in this picture, but when I got further article I was satisfied.

$0.00

1 vote

[-]

erickyoussif (62) · 6 years ago (edited)

my answer would be the computer, because without it we never had steemit hehehehe

but there is something in that picture really cool, when you look at it feels like peace and order

$0.00