与教师有关的事件频繁成为热点

春节之后的网络热点有一些涉及到了教师这个群体了。身为家长对这些话题还是比较关注的。
而最近比较火的两起事件。一起事件是学校的老师和自己的学生和自己未成年的学生谈恋爱。还发生了关系，另一起也是最近才爆出来的。是网上的一个视频，一个老师在办公室里。肆意的辱骂、扇耳光，霸凌一个女学生。这种事情如果在以前，没有视频证据，家长也会认为是老师在尽职尽责，严格的管教自己学习上不上进的孩子。但是如今有视频在网上，亲眼所见，这位老师的行为绝对不是在严格管教。而是有一种近乎变态的发泄情绪在里面。其实按人们的想象，校园应该是一个和谐。小朋友之间团结友爱，无忧无虑的生活环境。让他们在成长起来，接受激烈的社会竞争之前，享受一段和平宁静的幸福时光。

但事实上有时候校园里。很可能比成年人的社会更加的残酷。不光要面对同学之间的霸凌，现在还有老师的霸凌。当然也不能说，这就是普遍现象，至少，我们自己的孩子还没有碰到过任何类似的情况。但是从网上的消息来看，这次被曝光的老师霸凌事件。校方的处置可以说是息事宁人的测试，老师并没有受到任何的处罚，学生也仅仅是以进行了心理疏导搪塞过去了。所以说难保这样的事情以后不会再次发生，甚至进一步的扩大。

而之前那起老师和未成年学生发生关系的事件，也不能够以恋爱自由来辩护，这明显是是有违教师的职业道德的。

说到底会出现这样的情况，就是因为教育这个行业，还有教师这个职业还是不够市场化。现在的各国的公有教育体制都是脱胎于19世纪俾斯麦创立的义务教育制度。俾斯麦创立这一制度虽然客观上提高了人口素质和居民的识字率，但它的根本目的。还是为了推行民族主义，将德意志打造成一个国家和政府力量强大，国民绝对服从政府的军国主义体制。当然不是说现在的义务教育也是出于同样的目的，但是有一点，这样在政府和国家主导下的教育体制，它的教育的目标不是为了适应社会和市场的需求。而是要适应国家的需求。但是国家作为一个虚拟化的实体，是由一个个的人组成的，他并没有自己的欲望，所以它不像一个普通的市场化的企业那样可以通过员工创造的利润来评价员工的工作。消费者也无法通过自己的自由选择权来对那些提供不良甚至恶劣的教育服务的老师，进行用脚投票式的惩罚。这才是导致出现这类事件的根本原因。

其实这个道理很容易想清楚的。在中国改革开放之前和之初。大量的领域还在实行计划经济的时候，包括商店这样都是公办的供销社。据说在那个时候的供销社当中，还贴有这样的标语。“售货员不能打骂顾客。”如今就已经很难想象了，随便走进一家私营的超市或者商店营业员，哪个不是笑脸相迎，有问必答。而正是教育还在。公办教育为主，所以才会出现这种老师霸凌学生。之内缺乏职业道德的实践。当然最近国家处于刺激经济方面的考虑，市场化的教培行业又解除了打压。使得商业竞争能够进入教育行业也算是有所改进，当然家长的观念转变可能还需要很长一段时间。因为这些教培机构也都是在。国家主持的中考和高考的指挥棒，下运作并不是完全。迎合社会发展的需求。毕竟花钱上补习班的家长们需要看到。考试成绩来评价。校外培训机构的水平的。

－－－－－－－－－－－－

Some of the Internet hotspots after the Spring Festival involve teachers. As a parent, I am still more concerned about these topics.
And the two more popular incidents recently. One incident was when a teacher at school fell in love with his own student and his own underage student. There was also a relationship, and the other one broke out recently. It's a video on the internet of a teacher in the office. Wanton verbal abuse, slapping, and bullying of a schoolgirl. If there was no video evidence for this kind of thing before, parents would also think that the teacher was doing his duty and strictly disciplining his children who were not motivated in their studies. But now there are videos on the Internet, and I can see with my own eyes that this teacher's behavior is definitely not strict discipline. Rather, there is an almost perverted venting emotion in it. In fact, according to people's imagination, the campus should be harmonious. A carefree living environment for children to be united and friendly. Let them enjoy a peaceful and quiet happy time before they grow up and accept fierce social competition.

But in fact sometimes on campus. It is likely to be more brutal than adult society. Not only do you have to face bullying among classmates, but now you also have bullying from teachers. Of course, it can't be said that this is a universal phenomenon, at least, our own children have not encountered any similar situation. But judging from the news on the Internet, the teacher bullying incident that was exposed this time. The school's disposition can be said to be a test of calming the situation, the teacher was not punished in any way, and the student only prevaricated with psychological counseling. Therefore, it is difficult to guarantee that such a thing will not happen again in the future, or even expand further.

And the previous incident of a teacher having a relationship with an underage student cannot be defended by the freedom of love, which is obviously against the professional ethics of teachers.

In the final analysis, this situation will occur because the education industry and the teaching profession are still not market-oriented enough. The current public education system in various countries is born out of the compulsory education system founded by Bismarck in the 19th century. Although Bismarck's creation of this system objectively improved the quality of the population and the literacy rate of the population, it was its fundamental purpose. Or is it to promote nationalism and build Germany into a militaristic system in which the country and government are powerful and the people are absolutely subordinate to the government. Of course, it does not mean that the current compulsory education is also for the same purpose, but there is a point that the goal of such an education system under the leadership of the government and the state is not to meet the needs of society and the market. Rather, it is to adapt to the needs of the country. However, as a virtual entity, the state is composed of individual people, and he does not have his own desires, so it is not like an ordinary market-oriented enterprise that can evaluate the work of employees by the profits created by them. Nor can consumers vote with their feet on teachers who provide poor or even bad educational services through their own free choice. This is the root cause of these incidents.

In fact, this truth is easy to think clearly. Before and at the beginning of China's reform and opening up. A large number of fields were still implementing the planned economy, including shops, which were all public supply and marketing cooperatives. It is said that among the supply and marketing cooperatives at that time, such slogans were still pasted. "Salespeople can't beat and scold customers." Nowadays, it is hard to imagine that if you walk into a private supermarket or store salesperson, you will not be greeted with a smile and answered all questions. And it is education that is still there. Public education is the mainstay, which is why this kind of teacher bullying students. Lack of professional ethics within the practice. Of course, the state has recently been in consideration of stimulating the economy, and the market-oriented education and training industry has lifted the suppression. It is also an improvement to enable business competition to enter the education industry, although it may take a long time for parents to change their mindsets. Because these education and training institutions are also there. The baton of the high school entrance examination and the college entrance examination hosted by the state is not completely operated. Catering to the needs of social development. After all, parents who spend money on remedial classes need to see. Exam scores to evaluate. The level of off-campus training institutions.