I've studied economics at the undergraduate and graduate levels and studied these issues for a long time now, and I increasingly believe that the concept of economic predictions is mostly bogus. I think the most intelligent path forward is for people to make plans that account for the unpredictability of our economy and not to spend time finding the forecaster that is "always right" or mostly right.
Thoughts?
▶️ DTube
▶️ IPFS
Have you read Antifragile? Also, Black Swan by the same guy.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I haven't, although I have the 2nd edition of Black Swan which includes an extra section on fragility. Very interesting stuff.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I always feel really bad recommending Antifragile, because it's got a lot of interesting stuff in it, but it's sooooo badly edited that it's frustrating when all the cool ideas are scattered around randomly and not attached to things. Like, you're reading and thinking, dude I could have organized this stuff for you!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
While I do think that there are so many things going on that effect the economy to consistently and accurately predict what will happen in the future, I also think that you can make reasonable predictions within a set time that will come to pass. This isn't all the time though and I'd say that it's only possible in certain instances and up to a certain extent.
I 100% agree with you with you when you say to make plans for the unpredictability of our economy. The one thing you can count on is the fact the situations will pop up in the economy and if you aren't prepared for it then it could possible knock you off your feet for good.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Much like you I studied economics and geo-political policy. I believe the field to be a kind of fusion of political theory and math, where the underlying statistical data is interpreted using theory heavily tainted by a political brush. It is therefore extremely difficult for anyone to make predictions with a "definite" certainty because much of the variables are coming linked to political outcomes. In my opinion, the best economists are the ones that take in the most data and are able to make predictions based on probability, but even then there is no certainty that the highest probable outcome will always come to fruition.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Classical economics is a pseudo-science. But that's the orthodoxy, so that's what economists use in their models. This is why they so often come out wrong. Keynesians aren't much better at prediction, but they can be relied upon for post mortems.
Behavioral economics, however, is showing tremendous promise as a prediction method, and will eventually supplant classical economics and Keynesian economics in the area of forecasting. It's just a matter of keeping tracks of the Ws and Ls.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I tend to agree. Ultimately we live in an economy of an infinite number of potential variables all changing at various rates. Economic models can only reduce the complexity of our economic systems to a certain degree. I would also suggest that our models for measuring economic productivity are inherently flawed. Example: Say I have a child and you have a child. One day both our children are sick and we have to stay home to take care of them. That would be considered a loss of productivity. HOWEVER if I pay you to take care of my child and you pay me to take care of your child, these "economic transactions" are seen as increasing "economic productivity" even though it's essentially a wash. With that being said, like any good use of science the field of economics should always be questioned and hopefully evolve over time....
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I can understand,good one
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Actually im really bad at economics im chemical engineer we use analysis but i have no clue in the field
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
wow... you sharing an uncommon post about our life i learn something from your post...
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yeah i think so.. People waste time in predictions and gain nothing in the end..
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
There is no laboratory any where for economic forecasting. It is always a subject of mere conjectures.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I don't think anyone can perfectly predict the economy. At most times, predictions ar3 based on economic variables. These variables do not always point in the right direction, they are just a guide.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Honestly, economics was never my thing back then in school but I think it's possible. Yes it is
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
My plan is to keep on loading my treasure chest with silver and cash and keep on earning crypto currencies here on steemit. What are your plans David?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Laid down strategies and plan are more yielding and extremely productive than predictions.Predictions are merely based on sheer luck
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It was just a few years ago when many on Georgian Bay were freaking out about low water levels. Today we have the opposite problem. At Boating Georgian Bay we never believed in the panic regarding low water levels in Georgian Bay. Lobbyists and pundits were crying the sky is falling down, using every excuse from global warming to dredging in the St Clair River. It was all a bunch of nonsense. Great Lakes waters rise and fall over many years all on their own without any nefarious man made problems. Unfortunately there were some who used the opportunity of low water in Georgian Bay to create an artificial cause and raise cash for their own self gain. Shame ... shame. Next time we see low water levels again in about 5 years and someone comes telling you the sky is falling down, tell them history has already proven them full of crap. In fact we put it in writing half a dozen times that the panic on low water levels was bogus and these fluctuations happen cyclically over a number of years ... and they have been happening since the beginning of time and will continue to do so.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I tend to agree that you can't predict economies and markets. There are so many variables and unforeseen events that only broad assessments are somewhat accurate.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
your post is always good... I appreciate you dear...
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit