POST DELETED — SteemCN

Sort Order:

Trending

[-]

crypto.piotr (70) · 6 years ago

hi @robertoueti

Great choice of topic Robert

I will bookmark your post and read it right before bedtime :)
Piotr

$0.00

1 vote

[-]

robertoueti (67) · 6 years ago

Thanks man!

$0.03

2 votes

[-]

crypto.piotr (70) · 6 years ago

Dear @robertoueti

I never knew that Steemit can ban users already and did it lately. Great info buddy.

This is the beauty of the blockchain, no matter what companies and people want to show or not, information will always remain in the blockchain, without any restriction, thus guaranteeing freedom of expression, if people realize that their right to freedom is compromised, just make a copy of Steemit and put it on a server, ensuring that all posts are viewed by everyone.

Indeed. We only need to build some tools that would allow people to access all those informations. Tools that would not be centralized and easily controled.

Yours
Piotr

$0.00

1 vote

[-]

robertoueti (67) · 6 years ago

Totally agree,
We need to have something like a decentralized server which can be accessed with everyone. In that order nobody could sue the person of used server.
Thanks!

$0.03

2 votes

[-]

devann (61) · 6 years ago (edited)

Hi @robertoueti, whilst the dapps reserve a right to ban accounts for violations of their terms of use, I am not sure whether it is wise for them to rely on such terms without first giving the offending party the right to be heard and judged by an independent arbiter. I see that six accounts have been banned by steemit. I don't really know the reasons for their accounts being banned and whether they have been banned after a hearing by an independent arbiter. I suspect, the answer is a "no".

As more and more dapps come on board the steem blockchain and as competition increases among them, the dapps would be forced to be more circumspect in their enforcement of their terms of use, as users are not going to passively sit by and allow the dapps to enforce their terms of use indiscriminately.

However, if these accounts have been publishing content which are criminal or disclose criminal activities by the account holders, and are used to pursue such criminal activities, then the continued publication of their content on the dapps could be construed as aiding and abetting such crimes by the witnesses, in which case, the witnesses would be justified in banning the account summarily, without the right to be heard by an independent arbiter.

_{Posted using Steeve, an AI-powered Steem interface}

$0.00

1 vote

[-]

robertoueti (67) · 6 years ago

@devann,
I believe that apps have the right to exercise censorship when people meet the terms of service imposed for the use of the same. I also believe that in a while we will see that applications will have to be more "democratic" with regard to banning people, since, if they start banning simply because the stakeholders of that application did not like what was said, we will see an inactivation accounts in that application.
However, I believe that the witnesses do not have the power to block and end the X or Y account, after all, they can not simply change the blockchain with the blocks that are already recorded. If they do, it will be a shot in the foot, since they will denigrate the transparency and integrity of the blcokchain.
Of them not being accused of crime support, this is one of the things I believe we have to ask the developers to do. A network of computers that at the same time is client and server, ensuring that all people can have their content published in these decentralized networks and nobody knows where the servers are, thus ensuring the total truth freedom of expression.

$0.00

[-]

upvotebank (74) · 6 years ago

UpvoteBank	Your upvote bank
	This post have been upvoted by the @UpvoteBank service. Want to know more and receive "free" upvotes click here

$0.00

[-]

drotto (48) · 6 years ago

This post has received a 3.13 % upvote from @drotto thanks to: @sbi-booster.

$0.00

[-]

builderofcastles (64) · 6 years ago

Well, i hate to burst your bubble, but information has been removed from the Steem blockchain.

If you have enough witnesses who are willing to follow your orders, you can directly manipulated the chain. The trial was done a year and a bit ago. I don't even know what to search for to find it, but there were a couple posts about it.

$0.00

[-]

robertoueti (67) · 6 years ago

In the lasts blocks maybe... but the oldest ones no. Just if you rebuild all the blockchain until the first post until now.

$0.00

[-]

steem-ua (64) · 6 years ago

Hi @robertoueti!

Your post was upvoted by @steem-ua, new Steem dApp, using UserAuthority for algorithmic post curation!
Your UA account score is currently 3.531 which ranks you at #6251 across all Steem accounts.
Your rank has improved 12 places in the last three days (old rank 6263).

In our last Algorithmic Curation Round, consisting of 257 contributions, your post is ranked at #43.

Evaluation of your UA score:

You're on the right track, try to gather more followers.
The readers appreciate your great work!
Good user engagement!

Feel free to join our @steem-ua Discord server

$0.00